Bridging the gap between policy and practice: a qualitative analysis of providers’ field experiences tinkering with directly observed therapy in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Abstract

ObjectivesDrug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is one of the major public health threats in low-income countries such as Ethiopia. It is intertwined with larger socioeconomic and political factors that complicate its management and control. Whether directly observed therapy (DOT) is serving its purpose—better patient adherence and treatment outcome—still remains a debatable issue. To contribute to this discussion, this study explored health workers’ field experiences tinkering with DOT in patients with DR-TB in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.DesignA qualitative study using in-depth interviews and focus group discussion.SettingTen public healthcare facilities: eight health centres at Addis Ababa Health Bureau level and two TB-specialised hospitals at the Federal Health Bureau level in Ethiopia.Participants18 healthcare providers working with DR-TB patients.ResultsThree findings emerged from the analysis. First, the purpose of DOT is to ensure that patients go to healthcare facilities and swallow pills under the observation of a healthcare provider. Thus, its rigid application could lead to the emergence of more DR-TB. Second, DOT should be tinkered with and its practice improved by incorporating more counselling and health education, with more flexibility towards, and attentiveness of, patient context. Third, there exists a family-like patient-provider relationship, and providers do understand their patients and empathise with them to provide better healthcare services.ConclusionIf rigidly implemented, DOT could lead to more DR-TB—a problem DOT was invented to resolve. Front-line healthcare providers are sensitive to the tragic experiences of DR-TB patients and empathise with them. Thus, they do not strictly implement DOT and are willing to take any blame resulting from tinkering with it. It is high time to shape the practice of DOT for DR-TB patients, with meaningful contributions from front-line healthcare providers.

Containment of COVID-19 in Ethiopia and implications for tuberculosis care and research

“…Despite all these important public health containment measures, the outbreak still has the potential for greater loss of life in Ethiopia if the community is unable to shape the regular behavioral and sociocultural norms that would facilitate the spread of the disease. Many Ethiopians live in crowded conditions [13] and this would facilitate the spread of the disease.…”

Mathematical modeling for COVID-19 transmission dynamics: A case study in Ethiopia

“…As a consequence, the disease spread throughout the country and continued claiming many lives. In addition to weak health care system, many Ethiopians live in poor and crowded conditions [14] in large cities. This would further facilitate the spread of the disease.…”

‘We had to manage what we had on hand, in whatever way we could’: adaptive responses in policy for decentralized drug-resistant tuberculosis care in South Africa

“…‘Tinkering’ may thus serve different purposes in this setting: the absence of operational guidelines for policy implementation may open the space for ‘tinkering’ that is undertaken to meet minimum requirements for a functional delivery system. In other instances, however, health systems actors’ ‘tinkering’ extends beyond the status quo, demonstrating readiness to implement change towards improving quality of care ( Mussie et al , 2020 ). Relevant to this distinction are the kinds of organizational cultures that support adaptive practices in the clinic environment ( Weiner, 2009 ); HCWs’ capacity to provide individualized care may have less to do with available resources or the policy architecture, than with its ‘soft periphery’ ( Langley and Denis, 2011 ) that allows for discretionary decision-making space and power within specific contexts.…”