2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief motivational intervention for adolescent smokers in medical settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
111
0
14

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
111
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…27 An example is brief motivational interviewing, which can reduce cigarette smoking and increase serious attempts to quit in adolescents. 102,103 Another promising area of research is the use of selfadministered computer-facilitated screening tools combined with brief clinician intervention. 104 Internetbased intervention, including smart phone applications and social media, may also have utility in clinical settings and warrant investigation.…”
Section: Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 An example is brief motivational interviewing, which can reduce cigarette smoking and increase serious attempts to quit in adolescents. 102,103 Another promising area of research is the use of selfadministered computer-facilitated screening tools combined with brief clinician intervention. 104 Internetbased intervention, including smart phone applications and social media, may also have utility in clinical settings and warrant investigation.…”
Section: Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentro de la población de adolescentes la EM ha acumulado limitada pero prometedora evidencia (Brown et al, 2003(Brown et al, , 2009Colby et al, 1998Colby et al, , 2005Horn et al, 2007). Brown et al (2003) y Colby et al (1998) han encontrado efectos pequeños, pero no diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre la EM y el consejo breve en conseguir dejar de fumar.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Sin embargo, se observaba que la intervención motivacional era más eficaz en los adolescentes que tenían pocas intenciones para cambiar, y también que era más eficaz que el consejo breve para incrementar la autoeficacia con respecto a la habilidad para dejar de fumar. Colby et al (2005) evaluaron la eficacia del uso de una intervención motivacional breve para reducir el consumo de tabaco entre adolescentes. La muestra que utilizaron estaba compuesta por 85 adolescentes con un rango de edad de 14 a 19 años, con una edad media de 16 años.…”
Section: Adolescentesunclassified
“…The consultant shall respect the autonomy and freedom of choice of the consulted, who has a prominent role in the whole process (Rollnick & Miller, 1995;Miller & Rollnick, 2002). Many studies have supported the MI approach as particularly helpful, especially in populations suffering from various addictions such as smoking (Butler et al, 1999;Dunn, Deroo, & Rivara, 2001;Rollnick, Butler, & Scott, 1997;Rollnick & Heather, 1992), although most of them are short interventions for adolescents (Erol & Erdogan, 2008;Colby et al, 2005;Colby et al, 1998). Little is known however, about the application of MI in smoking cessation programs for adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%