1994
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-33061994000100008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Briófitas da caatinga 1: Estação Experimental do IPA, Caruaru - PE

Abstract: Foi realizado o levantamento da brioflora de uma caatinga arbórea pertencente a Estação Experimental da Empresa Pernambucana de Pesquisas Agropecuárias (IPA), situada no município de Caruaru (8º08'00"-8º10'00"S, 36º02'00"-36º 10'00"W), Pernambuco. A área estudada compreende 20ha, tem altitude aproximada de 550m e médias anuais de precipitação e temperatura de 671 mm e 23ºC, respectivamente. As coletas foram realizadas durante as estações de estiagem (out-nov/1990) e chuvosa (mai-jun/1991), tendo sido investiga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The annual species compensate for this water loss by producing a large number of spores and using their ornamentation to attract animals for their dispersion (Glime 2007;Vanderpoorten & Goffinet 2009). As in the present study, other floristic studies of bryophytes in the caatinga (Pôrto et al 1994;Bastos et al 1998b) have shown low species richness, with representative species typically being tolerant of exposure to intense light and heat, such as those of the families Pottiaceae and Ricciaceae. A little over one third of the species recorded in the present study were also included in the flora listed in the literature cited above.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The annual species compensate for this water loss by producing a large number of spores and using their ornamentation to attract animals for their dispersion (Glime 2007;Vanderpoorten & Goffinet 2009). As in the present study, other floristic studies of bryophytes in the caatinga (Pôrto et al 1994;Bastos et al 1998b) have shown low species richness, with representative species typically being tolerant of exposure to intense light and heat, such as those of the families Pottiaceae and Ricciaceae. A little over one third of the species recorded in the present study were also included in the flora listed in the literature cited above.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In the campos rupestres, bryophytes have been studied in the state of Minas Gerais-in the Serra do Cipó (Yano 1987), Serra da Piedade (Yano & Carvalho 1995) and Grão Mogol (Yano & Peralta 2009)-and in the state of Bahia, specifically within the Chapada Diamantina ecoregion (Harley 1995;Bastos et al 1998aBastos et al , 2000. Studies of bryophytes in the caatinga have been conducted in the states of Pernambuco (Pôrto et al 1994) and Bahia (Bastos et al 1998b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the vascular flora, there are some more or less constant species like the legumes Caesalpinia microphylla and Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia, the belly trees Cavanillesia arborea and Chorisia crispifolia, the Capparidaceae Capparis yco, several cacti of the genera Cereus and Opuntia, the Euphorbiaceae Jathropa and Cnidosculus phyllacanthus, the Apocynaceae Aspidosperma pyrifolium, the Rhamnaceae Ziziphus joazeiro, and the Anacardiaceae Spondias tuberosa (Rizzini, 1979;Ferri, 1980). Caatinga bryoflora has been poorly studied with the only reference being that of Pôrto et al (1994) The relation of families and species, with comments on the ecology and distribution is given below, as well as a summary table (Tab. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bryophytes have greater species richness in wet tropical forest than in dry tropical forests (see Delgadillo & Cárdenas 1990;Pôrto et al 1994;Pôrto & Bezerra 1996;Glime 2007;Silva & Germano 2013;Silva et al 2014). Despite soil islands being one of the richest microhabitats of rocky outcrops of xeric environments (Silva et al 2014), the richness of bryophytes is naturally low in these habitats (Silva & Germano 2013;Silva et al 2014), probably because of the low tolerance of bryophytes to water deficit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%