2009
DOI: 10.1049/el:20093214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadband substrate integrated waveguide to rectangular waveguide transition with fin-line

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main geometrical configurations for RWG-to-SIW transitions, namely the in-line and the right-angle configurations, which differ from one another because of the longitudinal axes of both waveguides being respectively collinear or perpendicular. In-line transitions [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] use probes or probes together with waveguide tapers and exhibit wide bandwidths at the expense of bulky volumes, thus making this geometry not suitable when compactness is required. Moreover, in-line transitions are not compatible with subarraying in the specific scenario of antenna arrays based on a tile architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main geometrical configurations for RWG-to-SIW transitions, namely the in-line and the right-angle configurations, which differ from one another because of the longitudinal axes of both waveguides being respectively collinear or perpendicular. In-line transitions [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] use probes or probes together with waveguide tapers and exhibit wide bandwidths at the expense of bulky volumes, thus making this geometry not suitable when compactness is required. Moreover, in-line transitions are not compatible with subarraying in the specific scenario of antenna arrays based on a tile architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A favorable fin‐line SIW‐waveguide transition has been investigated in recent years. It shows advantages of broadband bandwidths, low loss, compact structure and ease of integration . For example, the transition with an antipodal fin‐line shows about a 0.8 dB single transition insertion loss and greater than 12 dB return loss for back‐to‐back transitions over 10 GHz bandwidth from 26.5 to 40 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to obtain a mechanical simplicity, low loss, and broadband transition between SIW and rectangular waveguide. Over the last years, the transitions between SIW and waveguide have been developed extensively, which are realized by radial probe , height‐stepped waveguides , quasi‐Yagi antenna , antipodal fin‐lines , and coupling aperture . In , to achieve a broader bandwidth, the standard rectangular waveguide needs to be modified into height‐tapered or height‐stepped waveguide structures, which are somewhat complex from the mechanical view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%