2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burial depth and diameter of the rhizome fragments affect the regenerative capacity of a clonal shrub

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation is that ramets in stabilized sand dunes were too deeply buried by sand and unable to break through to the surface. This result is consistent with studies on Calligonum arborescens , where particular sand burial depth was an essential prerequisite for rhizomes to survive (Luo & Zhao, ). Deep sand burial could limit gaseous exchange and, in the absence of light, reduce elongation and subsequent leaf formation (Luo & Zhao, ; Samsone et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible explanation is that ramets in stabilized sand dunes were too deeply buried by sand and unable to break through to the surface. This result is consistent with studies on Calligonum arborescens , where particular sand burial depth was an essential prerequisite for rhizomes to survive (Luo & Zhao, ). Deep sand burial could limit gaseous exchange and, in the absence of light, reduce elongation and subsequent leaf formation (Luo & Zhao, ; Samsone et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This result is consistent with studies on Calligonum arborescens , where particular sand burial depth was an essential prerequisite for rhizomes to survive (Luo & Zhao, ). Deep sand burial could limit gaseous exchange and, in the absence of light, reduce elongation and subsequent leaf formation (Luo & Zhao, ; Samsone et al., ). In the present study, soil air‐filled porosity was reduced, with increased soil compaction in stabilized sand dunes (Table and Figure ), which may have retarded the ramets development, emergence, and survival (Maun, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Soil burial of rhizome fragments is necessary for survival in Physalis virginiana, P. heterophylla, and Calligonum arborescens (Abdullahi & Cavers, 1997;Luo & Zhao, 2015). This is because the fragments placed on the soil surface often suffer from dehydration and relatively high solar radiation during the re-rooting process (Zhu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Burial Depth On Stolon Fragment Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations caused by sediment burial are mainly caused by the physical burden on the buried parts of plants ( Maun, 1998 ; Werner and Zedler, 2002 ; Koning, 2004 ) and fluctuations in abiotic conditions, such as decreases in the light availability ( Madsen et al, 2001 ), changes in nutrient contents, particle composition, and temperature of the soil ( Xiao et al, 2010 ; Pan et al, 2016 ). However, under shallow or medium burial conditions, growth of some plants can be promoted via phenotypic plasticity, such as elongation of petioles, stem internodes, and rhizomes, and adjusting the number of ramets and the biomass allocation to aboveground parts ( Maun, 1998 ; Deng et al, 2008 ; Luo and Zhao, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clonal plants, studies on the responses to sediment burial mostly focus on the plasticity of clonal architecture and the change in clonal growth forms, such as the length of rhizomes and the number of clumping or spreading ramets ( Klimes et al, 1993 ; Li and Xie, 2009 ; Chen et al, 2011 , 2017 ). However, clonal integration among interconnected ramets, generally aids clonal plants to endure frequently occurring sediment burial ( Yu et al, 2001 , 2004 ; Chen et al, 2010 ; Luo and Zhao, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%