Burnout: Coaching versus Psychotherapie

Albrecht, Arnd; Hillert, Andreas; Albrecht, Evelyn

doi:10.1055/a-0556-2563

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The definition and description depend on the authors' business perspective, profession and his personal point of view as pointed out elsewhere (6). They are correspondingly highly heterogeneous (Figure 1).…”

Section: Material: Scientific-conceptual Therapeutic and Personal Pementioning

confidence: 98%

The Burnout Phenomenon: A Résumé After More Than 15,000 Scientific Publications

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The “burnout” phenomenon, supposedly caused by work related stress, is a challenge for academic psychiatry both conceptually and professionally. Since the first description of burnout in 1974 until today, more than 140 definitions have been suggested. Burnout–symptomatology's main characteristic, the experience of exhaustion, is unspecific. Different development–models of burnout were proposed, assumed to depict a quasi-natural process. These could not be confirmed empirically. An expert consensus on the diagnostic criteria and the conceptual location, whether as an independent disorder or as a risk, could not be agreed on. Nevertheless, the phenomenon of burnout in the ICD-11 is considered to be categorized as a work-related disorder. Psychiatric research on the burnout–phenomenon ignores problems of definition resulting from different perspectives: It may meet societal expectations, but does not fulfill scientific criteria, and therefore is not suitable to establish an objective diagnosis and treatment. Parallel detection of ICD/DSM diagnoses from an expert perspective and subjective perturbation models are considered appropriate.

show abstract

Section: Material: Scientific-conceptual Therapeutic and Personal Pementioning

confidence: 98%