2016
DOI: 10.1177/0954405415590562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burr formation and correlation with cutting force and acoustic emission signals

Abstract: The principle objective of this work is to present a methodology to evaluate the correlation between burr size attributes (thickness and height) and information computed from acoustic emission and cutting forces signals. In the proposed methodology, cutting force and acoustic emission signals were recorded in each cutting test, and each recorded original acoustic emission signal was segmented into two sections that correspond to steady-state cutting process (cutting signal) and cutting tool exit from the work … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These signals can include background noise such as mechanical, electrical, or acoustic. Aluminum alloys machining presents challenges such as burr formation, BUE, and adhesion of work parts to the cutting tools [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These signals can include background noise such as mechanical, electrical, or acoustic. Aluminum alloys machining presents challenges such as burr formation, BUE, and adhesion of work parts to the cutting tools [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, more complex signals can be observed in milling compared to those in many other non-traditional machining operations. As noted earlier, a certain number of difficulties including burr formation, BUE, and work part adhesion to the cutting tool are considered as frequent observations when machining AAs, [35][36][37][38] in principle the milling operation. To reduce the risk of the abovementioned issues, system stability and background noise were evaluated and controlled in preliminary experimental tests and new tool inserts were used after each cutting test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AE signal, x(t) extraction in each cutting trial concerning the cutting tool progress and exit from machined parts (Figure 5 The significant and insignificant variables and models are identified using statistical parameters, including p value, R 2 , and R 2 adj (section ''Method of analysis''). As previously noted in Songmene and his colleagues, [35][36][37][38] machining aluminum alloys is associated with a certain amount of difficulties including burr formation, built-up edge (BUE), and work part adhesion to the cutting tool. Therefore, to decrease the risk of the aforementioned issues and avoid harmful effects into the experimental set-up and recorded results, the following assumptions were proposed:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Apart from the above, a number of other investigations 3236 was carried out on burr minimization in face milling. Different factors governing burr formation were explored 32 during high-speed milling of wrought aluminum alloys by Niknam and Songmene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%