University tuition fees for undergraduates were abolished in Ireland in 1996. This paper examines the effect of this reform on the socio-economic gradient to determine whether the reform was successful in achieving its objective of promoting educational equality that is improving the chances of low socioeconomic status(SES) students progressing to university. It finds that the reform clearly did not have that effect. It is also shown that the university/SES gradient can be explained by differential performance at second level. Students from white collar backgrounds do significantly better in their final second level exams than the children of blue-collar workers. The results are very similar to recent findings for the UK. The results show that the effect of SES on school performance is generally stronger for those at the lower end of the conditional distribution of academic attainment.
1.IntroductionThe transition from secondary to higher education is an important milestone for an individual and one that generally brings substantial financial and other benefits. Understanding the barriers to making this transition is therefore important and has been widely studied by economists and others. The potential rôle of tuition costs is important because it is an instrument that governments can seek to manipulate. This paper is concerned with one large reform to tuition costs in an economy, Ireland, where there has been a longstanding concern that people from a low socio-economic status (SES) background are heavily under-represented in higher education in general and universities in particular. This has been well established in several official reports for example Clancy (1988Clancy ( , 2001) and most recently O'Connell et al (2006). This generates a high inter-generational correlation in educational attainment and clearly constrains social mobility. Leaving aside concerns about equity, it also implies an efficiency loss to the economy. The educational immobility between generations in Ireland is high relative to many other countries: in a crosscountry study of inter-generational educational mobility using data on OECD countriesChevalier et al (2009) find that the association between education levels of individuals and their parents was highest in Ireland 1 . While the scale of the problem is well known, there is a lack of research which establishes why low SES groups do not progress to higher education.There are some qualitative studies on the subject as well as numerous policy evaluations and reviews 2 . However these cannot (nor do they claim to) establish what the causal mechanisms behind educational disadvantage are, still less to quantify them. Hence they are of limited assistance in the design of policy.That said, the government operates several programs to deal with educational disadvantage in schools under the heading "Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools" (DEIS). These 1 Using a different methodology and different data, Asplund et al. (2008) also find that for a subset of OECD countries the associat...