2020
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2020.2992886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C3SRAM: An In-Memory-Computing SRAM Macro Based on Robust Capacitive Coupling Computing Mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To adequately reflect the additional computational complexity tackled by multibit accelerators, the respective quantization of weight n w and input n x can be factored in, similar to the approach taken in [19], yielding precision scaled TOP/s and TOP/s/W. This is shown in Table III, where recent implementations of analog in-memory MAC-operation accelerators using SRAM combined with capacitors [17], [18], [30], [31] are compared with the presented work.…”
Section: System Implementation Study and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To adequately reflect the additional computational complexity tackled by multibit accelerators, the respective quantization of weight n w and input n x can be factored in, similar to the approach taken in [19], yielding precision scaled TOP/s and TOP/s/W. This is shown in Table III, where recent implementations of analog in-memory MAC-operation accelerators using SRAM combined with capacitors [17], [18], [30], [31] are compared with the presented work.…”
Section: System Implementation Study and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the accelerator systems presented in [17] and [31] demonstrate high parallelism with completely binary implementations for inputs and weights. Note that, in binary cases, a multiply operation can be reduced to a single XNOR opera-tion [32].…”
Section: System Implementation Study and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the compute-in-memory (CiM) technology significantly reduces the latency and energy of the data movements compared to the von Neumann architecture, by enabling computations in the memory array. Recently, several researchers implemented XAC on CiM SRAMs by adding additional transistors to the conventional 6T SRAM for BNN [3,[5][6][7]. However, though such CiM SRAMs reduce the latency and energy of the data movements, the CiM SRAMs with the 2D planar structure suffer from the large cell area overhead (e.g., a 12T CiM SRAM has 2.7× larger cell area than the 6 T SRAM [3]), due to the additional transistors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, various types of CIM architectures have been investigated using memory cells as a synaptic device for weighted sum or vector-matrix multiplication (VMM). CIM accelerators based on the mainstream device technologies such as SRAM [3][4], NOR Flash [5] and NAND Flash [6][7][8][9] have been proposed and verified in silicon. Furthermore, the emerging nonvolatile (NVM) memories such as RRAM [10][11][12][13][14][15] and PCM [16][17] have been considered as strong candidates due to the multilevel capability (over SRAM) and lower programming voltage (over Flash).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%