2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0551-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA coexist in community and hospital settings in Uganda

Abstract: Background Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains were once confined to hospitals however, in the last 20 years MRSA infections have emerged in the community in people with no prior exposure to hospitals. Strains causing such infections were novel and referred to as community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA). The aim of this study was to determine the MRSA carriage rate in children in eastern Uganda, and to investigate coexistence between CA-MRSA and hospita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(97 reference statements)
3
50
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Emergence and spread of MRSA, both the CA-MRSA and the HA-MRSA, have been increasingly responsible for treatment failures as noted by a previous research report [15]. Vancomycin is the drug of choice to treat invasive MRSA infections [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emergence and spread of MRSA, both the CA-MRSA and the HA-MRSA, have been increasingly responsible for treatment failures as noted by a previous research report [15]. Vancomycin is the drug of choice to treat invasive MRSA infections [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) emerged in the late 1990s as major causes of skin and soft tissue infections in healthy people with no previous hospitalizations or recent histories of invasive procedures. CA-MRSA are newer and more virulent strains frequently associated with PVL which are associated with increased virulence [60]. CA-MRSA are distinct from HA-MRSA from an epidemiological, genotypic and phenotypic point of view.…”
Section: Methicillin-resistant S Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cross-sectional study was nested in previous studies/projects that investigated the pneumococcal nasopharyngeal colonization and integrated community case management of malaria and pneumonia in children less than 5 years of age at the Iganga/Mayuge Health and Demographic Surveillance Site (IMHDSS) in rural Eastern Uganda [20,21]. The study population was described before [20][21][22]; briefly, 764 healthy children less 5 years at the IMHDSS were enrolled and sampled. Following consent, a study nurse collected two nasopharyngeal samples (swabs) from each child.…”
Section: Study Setting Samples and Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate automated species'-level identification by the Phoenix ID/AST Expert System, we randomly selected 24 isolates representing presumptively identified isolates of S. aureus, S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus, and molecularly re-identified them by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described previously [26]. To determine the SCCmec types among the methicillin resistant staphylococci (MRS), SCCmec typing was done and interpreted as described previously [17,22,27]. For quality control, S. aureus ATCC™ 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC™ 29212 were included in the Phoenix ID/AST panels and molecular assays.…”
Section: Species Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%