Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term

Abstract

Data collection and analysis We identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria. Main results There were no included trials.

To ‘C’ or not to ‘C’?/Caesarean delivery upon maternal request: a review of facts, figures and guidelines

“…The truth is that there is currently insuffi cient data [73] and no evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) upon which to base any practice recommendations regarding CDMR [53] . In the absence of studies on CDMR, the knowledge base rests chiefl y on indirect evidence from proxies posing unique and signifi cant limitations [109] .…”

Women's knowledge of options for birth after Caesarean Section

“…A commitment to women's right to choose and their right to act on their choice supported by government and maternity care professionals is paramount.-Women's perceptions about the safety of a CS, compared to Vaginal Birth After Caesarean (VBAC) for mother and baby could indicate the type of information they have accessed and therefore their knowledge regarding birth options after CS and the impact of this on subsequent decision making. CS is a life saving intervention in certain circumstances, 23 but it must be recognized as a major surgical procedure with potential adverse effects on both mother and baby. 10 Many women choose CS to reduce the risk to their baby, yet there is a correlation between the CS rate and negative maternal and neonatal health outcomes.…”

Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non‐medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature

“…15 Thompson reviewed qualitative literature, but searched limited databases and only included studies from high-income countries. 9 Lavender et al 16 assessed evidence from randomized controlled trials; however, in the absence of data, they concluded there is "an urgent need for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative data. "…”