1993
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510070063037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcium Supplementation and Bone Mineral Density in Adolescent Girls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
83
1
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 384 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
83
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The supplemented group had an average daily calcium intake of 1,612 mg/d (1,000 mg/d calcium citrate) compared with 908 mg/d in the placebo group after a 3-year-supplementation period. A shorter trial of 18 months also found significant changes in lumbar spine aBMD in supplemented peripubertal girls with an average daily calcium intake of 1,300 mg/d compared with 960 mg/d in the control group [27]. In the present study, the supplemented group achieved positive skeletal responses with an average calcium intake of 1,563 mg/d compared with the placebo group of 786 mg/d.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The supplemented group had an average daily calcium intake of 1,612 mg/d (1,000 mg/d calcium citrate) compared with 908 mg/d in the placebo group after a 3-year-supplementation period. A shorter trial of 18 months also found significant changes in lumbar spine aBMD in supplemented peripubertal girls with an average daily calcium intake of 1,300 mg/d compared with 960 mg/d in the control group [27]. In the present study, the supplemented group achieved positive skeletal responses with an average calcium intake of 1,563 mg/d compared with the placebo group of 786 mg/d.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The result in boys may be a parallel to what has been found in intervention studies. In general, calcium intervention studies where the calcium intake was increased by a supplement have shown an increase in BMC or BMD during the intervention [18][19][20][21], but this effect disappeared after the calcium supplementation was stopped [22,23]. Another characteristic is that the increase in bone mineral appears early during the intervention with little further effect later on [18,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two of them an association was found: one with prepubertal children [16] and one with young children below 18 months of age [17]. Calcium intervention studies where calcium intake was increased by a supplement have generally shown a positive effect on bone mineralization during the intervention [18][19][20][21], but this effect disappeared after the calcium supplementation was stopped [22,23]. To our knowledge no studies have examined the relation between change in dietary calcium intake during the study period and bone growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During growth chronic calcium deficiency causes rickets [6,7]. Calcium supplementation in both pre-and post-pubertal healthy children leads to increased bone mass [44][45][46][47]. In adolescents the higher the calcium intake, the greater the calcium retention, with the highest retention occurring just after menarche [48,49].…”
Section: Skeletal Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%