2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2991(00)80262-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculations of pore size distributions in nanoporous materials from adsorption and desorption isotherms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is probably the reason why this elegant thermodynamic treatment of a complex, but still solvable pore space geometry has not found further attention so far. On a side note we mention that although such continuum approaches often exhibit deviations from microscopic simulations particularly at small pore sizes below 5 nm, general trends and at least qualitative agreement is still to be expected (Ravikovitch and Neimark 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is probably the reason why this elegant thermodynamic treatment of a complex, but still solvable pore space geometry has not found further attention so far. On a side note we mention that although such continuum approaches often exhibit deviations from microscopic simulations particularly at small pore sizes below 5 nm, general trends and at least qualitative agreement is still to be expected (Ravikovitch and Neimark 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some theories such as the Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda method (BJH) [33], the modified version of BJH recently developed by Kruk, Jaroniec, and Sayari (KJS) [34,35], the theory of Broekhoff and Boer (BdB) [36,37], and its modifications [38][39][40][41] use the reference system directly in the form of an experimental t-curve. The Horvath-Kawazoe [42] (HK) method developed for microporous carbonaceous materials uses the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential [42][43][44] derived from the perfect graphite sheets that make up the pore walls. The most sophisticated non-local density functional theory (NLDFT) [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] is also implicitly based on a reference adsorption isotherm of a nonporous solid because the solid-fluid molecular parameters are chosen to correlate the experimental reference isotherm.…”
Section: Basic Fundamentals Of Psd Nldft and Qsdft (Pore Size Distrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Horvath-Kawazoe [42] (HK) method developed for microporous carbonaceous materials uses the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential [42][43][44] derived from the perfect graphite sheets that make up the pore walls. The most sophisticated non-local density functional theory (NLDFT) [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] is also implicitly based on a reference adsorption isotherm of a nonporous solid because the solid-fluid molecular parameters are chosen to correlate the experimental reference isotherm. Therefore, the correct choice of a reference system is very important to obtain PSD reliably.…”
Section: Basic Fundamentals Of Psd Nldft and Qsdft (Pore Size Distrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both bulk and HOZs, modern pore modelling techniques based on non-localized density functional theory (NLDFT) are now routinely adopted for the assessment of micro- and mesopore sizes, volumes and surface areas in a single approach, yielding a good agreement with Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area and capillary condensation 70 . Nevertheless, these approaches may be in danger of becoming too ‘press button'.…”
Section: Pore Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%