2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2010.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of oxide materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common techniques use calibration standards and calibration curves to evaluate concentrations from the instrument signals [28]. There is an alternative technique to analytically determine the sample composition, and it is known as calibration-free LIBS (CF-LIBS) [29][30][31]. To apply this method, three conditions are necessary for the ablation and the resulted plasma [32,33]: (i) plasma is optically thin, (ii) plasma must be in LTE, and (iii) stoichiometric ablation.…”
Section: Laser Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common techniques use calibration standards and calibration curves to evaluate concentrations from the instrument signals [28]. There is an alternative technique to analytically determine the sample composition, and it is known as calibration-free LIBS (CF-LIBS) [29][30][31]. To apply this method, three conditions are necessary for the ablation and the resulted plasma [32,33]: (i) plasma is optically thin, (ii) plasma must be in LTE, and (iii) stoichiometric ablation.…”
Section: Laser Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration-free (CF) methods provide a more general framework for quantification without the need for calibrationcurves by accounting for matrix effects theoretically. This is achieved by applying the Boltzmann distribution law (Tognoni et al, 2010(Tognoni et al, , 2007Ciucci et al, 1999;Praher et al, 2010;Sallè et al, 2006), which assumes optically thin plasmas that are in local thermal equilibrium (LTE), to signals that contain peaks of all major elements in the target. Recently, multivariate analysis techniques have been applied to account for matrix bias through regression modeling of the spectra observed from samples of known composition.…”
Section: Signal Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While matrix-matched calibration-curves can be used for quantitative analysis of solids (Hunter and Piper, 2006;Eppler et al, 1996), various groups have successfully implemented CF-LIBS to quantify the composition of metal alloys (Tognoni et al, 2007(Tognoni et al, , 2010Ciucci et al, 1999;Herrera et al, 2009a) and metal oxides (Praher et al, 2010) in a gaseous environment, achieving relative accuracies of 5 to 15% for major elements. With regard to interpretation of natural sediments and rocks, most studies report degradation in accuracy due to the complexity of the signals obtained (Tognoni et al, 2010;Herrera et al, 2009b;Colao et al, 2004;De Giacomo et al, 2007).…”
Section: Sediments and Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CF-LIBS method has been introduced recently 32 . We developed a modified CF-LIBS algorithm in order to increase the accuracy of element and oxide concentration values calculated from measured LIBS spectra 33 . This algorithm includes a fast iterative correction of radiation self-absorption effects and of plasma parameters.…”
Section: Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Of Functional Oxide Matmentioning
confidence: 99%