2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8ad2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of Ultraviolet, Mid-infrared, and Radio Star Formation Rate Indicators

Abstract: We present calibrations for star formation rate (SFR) indicators in the ultraviolet, mid-infrared, and radiocontinuum bands, including one of the first direct calibrations of 150 MHz as an SFR indicator. Our calibrations utilize 66 nearby star-forming galaxies with Balmer-decrement-corrected Ha luminosities, which span five orders of magnitude in SFR and have absolute magnitudes of M 24 12 r -< < -. Most of our photometry and spectrophotometry are measured from the same region of each galaxy, and our spectroph… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
90
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(251 reference statements)
18
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining our largest apertures and the integrated fields, we observe that our data altogether are consistent with a single slope that is shallower than most of the monochromatic SFR prescriptions in the literature. These data fall between relations from Catalán-Torrecilla et al (2015), Cluver et al (2017), and Brown et al (2017). Fig.…”
Section: Monochromatic Sfrssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Combining our largest apertures and the integrated fields, we observe that our data altogether are consistent with a single slope that is shallower than most of the monochromatic SFR prescriptions in the literature. These data fall between relations from Catalán-Torrecilla et al (2015), Cluver et al (2017), and Brown et al (2017). Fig.…”
Section: Monochromatic Sfrssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…(1) where L c = 6.4 × 10 21 W Hz −1 . This SFR calibration has been used by both Smolčić et al (2009) andNovak et al (2017), and is comparable to recent calibrations by Boselli et al (2015) and Brown et al (2017) for < L * galaxies. We then used the 1/V max method (Schmidt, 1968), with the SFR divided by the volume in which the galaxy could be detected, to find the SFRD contribution for each galaxy.…”
Section: The Cosmic Star Formation Historysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Using the Brown et al (2017) nearby galaxy sample, we find star forming galaxies have i-band to 1.4 GHz flux density ratios that range from 0.1 to 30, so we expect low redshift S 1.4 = 40 µJy star forming galaxies to be brighter than i = 22.4. At z = 1.15 the i-band and 1.4 GHz correspond to u-band and 3.0 GHz respectively, and we find the Brown et al (2017) nearby galaxy sample u-band to 3.0 GHz flux density ratios range from 0.05 to 20, so we expect z ∼ 1.15 S 1.4 = 40 µJy star forming galaxies to be brighter than i = 23.2. We thus conclude that the bulk of the radio sources without i < 26.5 optical counterparts are AGNs or z > 1.3 galaxies.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 87%
“…We find that SDSS J0838 is in the WISE point source catalog and we can derive its SFR from its observed mid-IR magnitudes. Following Brown et al (2017) we will focus our comparison using the luminosity estimated in the W3 bandpass centered in 22 µm (L22) which displays the best correlation with other independent estimators. Several regressions for different SFR estimators have been derived recently by Lee et al (2013), Wen et al (2014), Davies et al (2016) and Catalán-Torrecilla et al (2015) for different samples of galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%