2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00899.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calves Born after Direct Transfer of Vitrified Bovine In Vitro‐produced Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Immature Oocytes

Abstract: Vitrification has been the method of choice for the cryopreservation of bovine oocytes, as rapid cooling decreases chilling sensitivity. The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro and in vivo survival and the viability of immature oocytes vitrified using super-cooled liquid nitrogen. Immature oocytes were randomly allocated to three groups: (i) non-vitrified control group, (ii) vitrified in normal (-196 degrees C) liquid nitrogen (LN(2)) and (iii) vitrified in super-cooled LN(2) (< or =-200 degrees C)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, vitrified in vitromatured oocytes formed second polar bodies and pronuclei, events that depend on release of intracellular Ca 2þ [38]. Deficiencies in the ability of the ER to reorganize following IVM and/or other components of cytoplasmic maturation could help explain the low developmental rates reported by others following oocyte cryopreservation and IVM [23,25,[28][29][30][31]. Additional causes of low developmental competence in some cryopreserved oocytes could be that the zona pellucida is modified, such that it hardens and prevents fertilization in some cases [3,7,11,15,47].…”
Section: Mouse Oocyte Vitrification 151mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, vitrified in vitromatured oocytes formed second polar bodies and pronuclei, events that depend on release of intracellular Ca 2þ [38]. Deficiencies in the ability of the ER to reorganize following IVM and/or other components of cytoplasmic maturation could help explain the low developmental rates reported by others following oocyte cryopreservation and IVM [23,25,[28][29][30][31]. Additional causes of low developmental competence in some cryopreserved oocytes could be that the zona pellucida is modified, such that it hardens and prevents fertilization in some cases [3,7,11,15,47].…”
Section: Mouse Oocyte Vitrification 151mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the reorganization of the ER that normally occurs during oocyte maturation was impaired by this process. Although vitrification of immature oocytes followed by in vitro maturation yields morphologically normal oocytes that exhibit some of the properties of early development following fertilization, cytoplasmic maturation is disrupted, and this could account for the reduced developmental potential observed previously following vitrification and in vitro maturation [23,25,[28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These negative effects have limited the widespread use of slow freezing techniques. Since the invention of vitrification by Rall and Fahy [10], it has been widely applied for the cryopreservation of human oocytes [11], a variety of domestic and laboratory animals [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], as well as other mammalian embryos [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Furthermore, vitrification is considered to be a better alternative to slow freezing cryopreservation [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, oocytes are much more difficult to cryopreserve than embryos due to their morphology, higher cryosensitivity and low hydraulic conductivity (Leibo, 1980;Ambrosini et al, 2006). Although, several experiments have been performed using different vitrification protocols with matured and immature bovine oocytes (Vajta et al, 1998;Men et al, 2002;Albarracin 2005;Magnusson et al, 2008;Morato et al, 2008;Vieira et al, 2008;Sripunya et al, 2010, Zhou et al, 2010, survival rates after warming have been low, with embryo production rates between 0 to 13% (Vajta et al, 1998;Dinnyes et al, 2000;Morato et al, 2008;Sripunya et al, 2010;Zhou et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%