2007
DOI: 10.1002/sia.2474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can direct field‐evaporation of doubly charged ions and post‐ionisation from the singly charged state co‐exist?

Abstract: A tin liquid metal ion source (LMIS) containing ∼14% Pb has been studied. From a careful examination of the mass spectra of the source, it is concluded that post-ionisation (PI) is the most probable mechanism for the formation of Pb 2+ ions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process of atom detachment from the surface under high electric fields is extensively debated in field evaporation theory. The models that exist to explain the experimental observation of the atom detachment under the high electric field [16][17][18][19] are based on the generalized approach to give a qualitative description of the interaction of a metal surface with a n-charged ion using a standard potential [13,20]. Such an approach practically cannot guarantee a reliable prediction on the surface breakage for a particular metal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of atom detachment from the surface under high electric fields is extensively debated in field evaporation theory. The models that exist to explain the experimental observation of the atom detachment under the high electric field [16][17][18][19] are based on the generalized approach to give a qualitative description of the interaction of a metal surface with a n-charged ion using a standard potential [13,20]. Such an approach practically cannot guarantee a reliable prediction on the surface breakage for a particular metal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V nm -1 [28] and ~1 V nm -1 [25] respectively for tin. Since the electric field across a typical ~ 0.2 nm gap in our samples can exceed ~50 V nm -1 at the peak ramped voltage (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The literature [25,26,28] shows that the electric fields required for EFIE and EFISD are ~26 V nm -1 [28] and ~1 V nm -1 [25] respectively for tin. Since the electric field across a typical ~ 0.2 nm gap in our samples can exceed ~50 V nm -1 at the peak ramped voltage (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%