Can School Children Support Ecological Research? Lessons from the <i>Oak Bodyguard</i> Citizen Science Project

Abstract

Scientific knowledge in the field of ecology is increasingly enriched by data acquired by the general public participating in citizen science (CS) programs. Yet, doubts remain about the reliability of such data, in particular when acquired by schoolchildren. We built upon an ongoing CS program, Oak Bodyguards, to assess the ability of schoolchildren to accurately estimate the strength of biotic interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. We used standardized protocols to estimate attack rates on artificial caterpillars and insect herbivory on oak leaves. We compared estimates made by schoolchildren with estimates made by professional scientists who had been trained in predation and herbivory assessments (henceforth, trained scientists), and trained scientists' estimates with those made by professional scientists with or without expertise (untrained) in predation or herbivory assessment. Compared with trained scientists, both schoolchildren and untrained professional scientists overestimated attack rates, but assessments made by the latter were more consistent. Schoolchildren tended to overestimate insect herbivory, as did untrained professional scientists. Raw data acquired by schoolchildren participating in CS programs therefore require several quality checks by trained professional scientists before being used. However, such data are of no less value than data collected by untrained professional scientists. CS with schoolchildren can be a valuable tool for carrying out ecological research, provided that the data itself is acquired by professional scientists from material collected by citizens.

Grass Gazers: Using citizen science as a tool to facilitate practical and online science learning for secondary school students during the COVID‐19 lockdown

“…To maximize success, a CS project still needs resources and careful design (Bonney et al, 2016;Edelson et al, 2018;Herodotou et al, 2018;Naqshbandi et al, 2020), ideally including preliminary trials. CS projects involving school students may require greater investment in quality control (Castagneyrol et al, 2020;Saunders et al, 2018).…”

Primary School Science Teachers’ Creativity and Practice in Malaysia

“…The concept of creative science teaching or creative pedagogy is embedded in several instances of unconventional teaching strategies, among which meaningful discovery (Khabibah et al, 2017;Wartono et al, 2017), student-based investigations (Allchin et al, 2014), inquiry in historical experiment exploration (Schvartzer et al, 2021), engagement in scientifically oriented inquiry (Cairns & Areepattamannil, 2019;Wagh et al, 2017), prioritizing direct experience and personal reflection (Djonko-Moore et al, 2018;Horng et al, 2005), evidence-based explanations by a field expert (Castagneyrol et al, 2020;Kelemen-Finan et al, 2018), interdisciplinary STEM (Abdullah et al, 2018;Karampelas, 2019) and connecting explanations to scientific knowledge (Henriksen & Mishra, 2015;Miller & Krajcik, 2019). In addition to the listed strategies for teaching science content, skills and values, creative science learning is also infused in the way knowledge is transferred or communicated (Conradty et al, 2020).…”

Exploring the impacts of contextualised outdoor science education on learning: the case of primary school students learning about ecosystem relationships

“…For example, when birds attempt to glean caterpillar decoys, they leave beak imprints, and small mammals and arthropods leave bite marks (Low et al 2014). These artificial larvae are used in ecological research such as testing for the effect of plant diversity on herbivore control by predators (Muiruri, Rainio, and Koricheva 2016) as well as citizen science (Castagneyrol et al 2020).…”