2009
DOI: 10.1785/0120080332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the Fisk Conjecture be Explained by Rock Damage Around Explosions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They claim that contributions of damage to the radiation from earthquakes can be comparable to or larger than the contribution of moment release due to slip on earthquake faults. Material damage has long been recognized by explosion and earthquake seismologists as a potential source, and models for the seismic radiation have been developed over the years [e.g., Mal and Knopoff , 1967; Knopoff and Randall , 1970; Ashby and Sammis , 1990; Johnson and Sammis , 2001; Taylor , 2009]. Among the predictions of these models is the fact that source medium damage can radiate waves as volumetric, double couple, and compensated linear vector dipole (CLVD) body force systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They claim that contributions of damage to the radiation from earthquakes can be comparable to or larger than the contribution of moment release due to slip on earthquake faults. Material damage has long been recognized by explosion and earthquake seismologists as a potential source, and models for the seismic radiation have been developed over the years [e.g., Mal and Knopoff , 1967; Knopoff and Randall , 1970; Ashby and Sammis , 1990; Johnson and Sammis , 2001; Taylor , 2009]. Among the predictions of these models is the fact that source medium damage can radiate waves as volumetric, double couple, and compensated linear vector dipole (CLVD) body force systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical controls on explosion‐induced S wave spectra remain debated. If a difference in source spectra explains the observed frequency dependence of P / S ratios, the physical cause may be rooted in the different P and S wave elastic length scales of sensitivity to near‐source rock damage (Taylor, 2009). However, a variety of complicated and locally specific effects such as spall and free‐surface topographic scattering are thought to influence explosion‐induced S wave spectra (e.g., Patton & Taylor, 1995; Xie & Lay, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fisk (2006Fisk ( , 2007 has postulated that explosion P/S values can be modeled using the Mueller-Murphy P-wave model where the S-wave are calculated by scaling the S-wave corner frequency by the ratio of the S to P-wave velocity. Taylor (2009) has proposed that this S-wave corner frequency effect might be due to rock damage from the explosion and that it might persist even for very overburied events. In Figure 7, we show that using this explosion model predicts that the P/S value for Hellum-1 is expected to be much lower at 2-4 and 4-6 Hz than the other PNEs measured here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%