2013
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2013.340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabinoid Receptor Activation Shifts Temporally Engendered Patterns of Dopamine Release

Abstract: The ability to discern temporally pertinent environmental events is essential for the generation of adaptive behavior in conventional tasks, and our overall survival. Cannabinoids are thought to disrupt temporally controlled behaviors by interfering with dedicated brain timing networks. Cannabinoids also increase dopamine release within the mesolimbic system, a neural pathway generally implicated in timing behavior. Timing can be assessed using fixed-interval (FI) schedules, which reinforce behavior on the bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
44
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wait time dopamine levels decayed according to an exponential function for the first 15 s (prior to the first possible CS presentation) and by a linear function thereafter in Long Wait trials (Figure 1C, Figure S1). This reduction in wait time dopamine levels is consistent with the time-dependent decrease in dopamine neuron firing prior to the presentation of a CS (Bromberg-Martin et al, 2010; Pasquereau and Turner, 2015), as well as with the cumulative decrease in NAc dopamine levels observed across trials and throughout behavioral sessions (Bassareo et al, 2015; Oleson et al, 2014). Inhibiting dopamine neuron activity accelerates the subjective estimate of elapsed time (Soares et al, 2016), which suggests the decrease in wait time dopamine levels could signal the passage of time.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Wait time dopamine levels decayed according to an exponential function for the first 15 s (prior to the first possible CS presentation) and by a linear function thereafter in Long Wait trials (Figure 1C, Figure S1). This reduction in wait time dopamine levels is consistent with the time-dependent decrease in dopamine neuron firing prior to the presentation of a CS (Bromberg-Martin et al, 2010; Pasquereau and Turner, 2015), as well as with the cumulative decrease in NAc dopamine levels observed across trials and throughout behavioral sessions (Bassareo et al, 2015; Oleson et al, 2014). Inhibiting dopamine neuron activity accelerates the subjective estimate of elapsed time (Soares et al, 2016), which suggests the decrease in wait time dopamine levels could signal the passage of time.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The optogenetic results are inconsistent with predicted changes in the psychometric curve under pure manipulation of time (Figure S8). Therefore, while the dopamine system has been linked to timing behaviors under certain experimental settings (Buhusi and Meck, 2005; Oleson et al, 2014), neither our physiological measurements nor our behavioral manipulations can be fully explained as dopamine signaling the time intervals alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In order to directly assess the role of dopamine in implementation of this behavior, fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) with chronically implanted carbon fiber microelectrodes (Clark et al, 2010; Oleson et al, 2014) was employed to monitor subsecond dopamine changes in the dorsal striatum during behavior (Figure 1E; Figure S1A–S1C). Dorsal striatal dopamine concentration increased after trial onset, and remained elevated during 2 s trials (Figure 1F and 1H; paired t-test, t 10 = 2.210, P < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Renoir et al, 2012;Che et al, 2013). With-35 drawal from stimulants is accompanied by dysphoric state 36 which contributes to drug-seeking behavior and relapse, 37 and causes treatment failure in individuals with stimulant 38 dependence (Koob et al, 1998;Oleson et al, 2014). 39 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%