1998
DOI: 10.1006/nbdi.1998.0219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabinoid Transmission and Reward-Related Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
140
3
9

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 222 publications
4
140
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…It remains controversial whether marijuana is an atypical or anomalous addictive drug, which interacts with brain reward systems differently than drugs such as methamphetamine that directly activate brain DA systems (e.g., Gardner and Vorel 1998). Our finding of no rCBF changes in the nucleus accumbens and basal ganglia may be taken as support for the position that smoking marijuana does not directly activate reward-relevant DA neurons in the nucleus accumbens and/or basal ganglia.…”
Section: Smoking Marijuana Does Not Increase Rcbf In Basal Ganglia Nmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…It remains controversial whether marijuana is an atypical or anomalous addictive drug, which interacts with brain reward systems differently than drugs such as methamphetamine that directly activate brain DA systems (e.g., Gardner and Vorel 1998). Our finding of no rCBF changes in the nucleus accumbens and basal ganglia may be taken as support for the position that smoking marijuana does not directly activate reward-relevant DA neurons in the nucleus accumbens and/or basal ganglia.…”
Section: Smoking Marijuana Does Not Increase Rcbf In Basal Ganglia Nmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…These models include intracranial electrical self-stimulation techniques. Consistent with a role of cannabinoids in the motivational effects of other events that can function as rewards or reinforcers, it has been shown that THC lowers the threshold for electrical brain-stimulation reward in Lewis and Sprague-Dawley rat strains, and that withdrawal from a single administration of THC can elevate brain-stimulation reward thresholds (Gardner et al, 1988;1989;Lepore et al, 1996;Gardner and Vorel, 1998). However, these findings contrast with the lack of THC effects in the Fisher rat strain (Lepore et al, 1996), and the lack of effects of the synthetic CB1 receptor agonist CP 55,940 using the same procedure and a comparable range of doses (Arnold et al, 2001).…”
Section: Subjective and Motivational Effects Of Cannabinoidsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It has been confirmed that Δ 9 -THC shares many features with classical drugs of abuse, such as cocaine and heroin (for review see Gardner and Vorel, 1998;Tanda and Goldberg, 2003;Lupica et al, 2004). For example, THC lowers electrical brain-stimulation reward thresholds (Gardner et al, 1988), and increases the firing rate of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopaminergic neurons projecting to the nucleus accumbens (French et al, 1997;Gifford et al, 1997), resulting in increased extracellular levels of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (e.g., Chen et al, 1990;Tanda et al, 1997).…”
Section: Subjective and Motivational Effects Of Cannabinoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, THC also has an indirect action on dopamine neurotransmission in the mesolimbic and mesocortical systems (Ameri, 1999;Gardner and Vorel, 1998;Tanda and Goldberg, 2003;Tanda et al, 1997), suggesting that the acute effects of THC include altered catecholamine activity within the corticolimbic pathways that mediate decision-making cognition (Scarna et al, 2005). Other studies in humans indicate that smoked marijuana alters regional cerebral blood flow (ie neural activity) within orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal areas (Mathew et al, 2002;O'Leary et al, 2002;Volkow et al, 1996) known to subserve decision-making function (eg Bechara et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%