Aim
To analyze interrelationships in the consumption of opiates and
cannabinoids in a legal regime and, specifically, whether consumers of
opiates and cannabinoids treat them as substitutes for each other.
Method
Econometric dynamic panel data models for opium consumption are
estimated using the generalized method of moments (GMM). A unique dataset
containing information about opiate (opium) consumption from the Punjab
province of British India for the years 1907–1918 is analyzed
(n=272) as a function of its own price, the prices of two forms of cannabis
(the leaf (bhang), and the resin (charas, or hashish)), and wage income.
Cross-price elasticities are examined to reveal substitution or
complementarity between opium and cannabis.
Results
Opium is a substitute for charas (or hashish), with a cross price
elasticity (β3) of 0.14 (p < 0.05), but not for
bhang (cannabis leaves; cross price elasticity = 0.00, p > 0.10).
Opium consumption (β1 = 0.47 to 0.49, p < 0.01)
shows properties of habit persistence consistent with addiction. The
consumption of opium is slightly responsive (inelastic) to changes in its
own price (β2 = −0.34 to −0.35, p
< 0.05 to 0.01) and consumer wages (β4 = 0.15, p
< 0.05).
Conclusion
Opium and hashish, a form of cannabis, are substitutes. In addition,
opium consumption displays properties of habit persistence and slight price
and wage income responsiveness (inelasticity) consistent with an addictive
substance.