2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40333-015-0013-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canopy interception loss in a Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forest of Northeast China

Abstract: Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica is one of the main species to be afforested in deserts of China. But little work has been carried out on the canopy interception loss of this plant species. For researching the canopy interception loss of a natural P. sylvestris forest, we observed the gross precipitation, gross snowfall, throughfall and stemflow in a sample plot at the Forest Ecosystem Research Station of Mohe in the Great Khingan Mountains of Northeast China from July 2012 to September 2013. Considering the sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the water samples were collected after each rainfall event during the growth season from 13 August 2015 to 29 July 2016, and samples were not collected during the frozen season (November 2015 to March 2016). Torstenw and Li’s methods were used to collect the precipitation, throughfall and stemflow data, and the details are as follows 32,44 :Precipitation: the rainfall was sampled in the non-forest site with 5 homemade continuous rain gauges (surface collection area of 0.64 m 2 ).Throughfall: the throughfall was recorded using 5 PVC rectangle grooves (surface collection area of 400 cm × 16 cm) in the 3 plots, and 5 gutters were set up 1 m above the floor to avoid ground splash effects. Furthermore, the gutters were also set up at a 5° angle to horizontal to promote drainage, and the lower end of each gutter was equipped with a plastic bucket.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the water samples were collected after each rainfall event during the growth season from 13 August 2015 to 29 July 2016, and samples were not collected during the frozen season (November 2015 to March 2016). Torstenw and Li’s methods were used to collect the precipitation, throughfall and stemflow data, and the details are as follows 32,44 :Precipitation: the rainfall was sampled in the non-forest site with 5 homemade continuous rain gauges (surface collection area of 0.64 m 2 ).Throughfall: the throughfall was recorded using 5 PVC rectangle grooves (surface collection area of 400 cm × 16 cm) in the 3 plots, and 5 gutters were set up 1 m above the floor to avoid ground splash effects. Furthermore, the gutters were also set up at a 5° angle to horizontal to promote drainage, and the lower end of each gutter was equipped with a plastic bucket.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raz-Yaseef, Rotenberg, and Yakir (2010) reported that mean soil evaporation measured in sun-exposed areas was double than that of shaded areas. Canopy interception can account for 10-40% of annual evapotranspiration (Chang et al, 2013;Raz-Yaseef et al, 2010), an amount that varied with canopy density (Kumagai et al, 2014), rainfall intensity (Fang, Zhao, Jian, & Kai, 2013), and precipitation type (Li, Cai, Man, Sheng, & Ju, 2015). Canopy interception can account for 10-40% of annual evapotranspiration (Chang et al, 2013;Raz-Yaseef et al, 2010), an amount that varied with canopy density (Kumagai et al, 2014), rainfall intensity (Fang, Zhao, Jian, & Kai, 2013), and precipitation type (Li, Cai, Man, Sheng, & Ju, 2015).…”
Section: Effects Of Plant Species On Water Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater canopy coverage also increased intercepted water loss. Canopy interception can account for 10-40% of annual evapotranspiration (Chang et al, 2013;Raz-Yaseef et al, 2010), an amount that varied with canopy density (Kumagai et al, 2014), rainfall intensity (Fang, Zhao, Jian, & Kai, 2013), and precipitation type (Li, Cai, Man, Sheng, & Ju, 2015). Large evapotranspiration values, combined with low levels of soil water infiltration, could cause severe soil desiccation.…”
Section: Effects Of Plant Species On Water Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown there is a significant effect in vegetation restoration in semiarid areas since the afforestation projects were implemented (Hou, Li, Wang, & Zhang, 2016), afforestation benefits carbon sequestration through the accumulation of aboveground and belowground biomass (Li et al, 2012). The Pinus sylvestris planted forest, as an evergreen, cold‐resistant, and drought‐tolerant tree species, plays a key role in desertification control (Li, Cai, Man, Sheng, & Ju, 2015; Song, Zhu, Li, Zhang, & Lv, 2016) in arid and semiarid desert regions of northern China. Planting P. sylvestris is beneficial for increasing soil carbon storage (Gao & Huang, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%