1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6521(1997)1:3<119::aid-fact2>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capabilities and limitations of ion mobility spectrometry for field screening applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its sensitivity and robustness, IMS has limited chemical specificity, partly resulting from the low temporal resolution inherent in the separation of the ion mobility peaks, which can result in false positive results [11]. The use of a radiation-based ionization source, which is subject to safety and bureaucratic limitations, is another disadvantage [12]. Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) has also been employed to detect trace quantities of TAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its sensitivity and robustness, IMS has limited chemical specificity, partly resulting from the low temporal resolution inherent in the separation of the ion mobility peaks, which can result in false positive results [11]. The use of a radiation-based ionization source, which is subject to safety and bureaucratic limitations, is another disadvantage [12]. Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) has also been employed to detect trace quantities of TAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Use of explosives sniffing dogs, though attractive, is not very practical. 4,5 Presently used detection techniques are either bulky and expensive, such as ion mobility spectrometry devices, 6 or suffer from low sensitivity. Despite their high selectivity, techniques based on Raman and laserinduced breakdown spectroscopies have weak signals making them better suited to bulk material detection than to trace vapor detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Although it is the most widely used method and is highly effective, trace explosive detection based on canines is neither cost effective nor suitable for mass deployment. 4,5 Currently available trace detection technologies, such as ion mobility spectrometry 6 are bulky and expensive. Optical spectroscopic techniques such as Raman and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopies are highly selective but suffer from poor sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%