1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8227(88)80079-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillary glucose determination in the screening of gestational diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although capillary blood testing is less accurate than venous, the difference in accuracy that we observed in capillary vs plasma GCT (area under the ROC value differences of ~ 0.03) was similar to that in the SIGT study [7], and smaller than has been observed with capillary vs plasma fasting glucose [20]; however, while area under the ROC values were similar, mean glucose levels were consistently higher in capillary vs plasma GCT tests; screening with capillary GCT would require the use of higher threshold values to achieve similar sensitivity and specificity, as has been suggested previously for gestational diabetes screening [21]. While capillary testing is more convenient and can provide immediate results to patients, capillary GCT thresholds might differ with alternative glucose meter systems, and improvements in accuracy and standardization of capillary meters may be needed before widespread use of a capillary screening test could be recommended.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Although capillary blood testing is less accurate than venous, the difference in accuracy that we observed in capillary vs plasma GCT (area under the ROC value differences of ~ 0.03) was similar to that in the SIGT study [7], and smaller than has been observed with capillary vs plasma fasting glucose [20]; however, while area under the ROC values were similar, mean glucose levels were consistently higher in capillary vs plasma GCT tests; screening with capillary GCT would require the use of higher threshold values to achieve similar sensitivity and specificity, as has been suggested previously for gestational diabetes screening [21]. While capillary testing is more convenient and can provide immediate results to patients, capillary GCT thresholds might differ with alternative glucose meter systems, and improvements in accuracy and standardization of capillary meters may be needed before widespread use of a capillary screening test could be recommended.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…104 The most commonly cited levels for the GCT are 7.2 and 7.8 mmol/l. ROC analysis by Meriggi and coworkers 149 has suggested a 7.5 mmol/l threshold while Sermer and co-workers 31 found values of 7.9-8.3 mmol/l, depending on time since last meal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Lavin 148 reported the same PPV at ≥ 8.3 mmol/l. A study in a high prevalence group (European and Asian, 6.6%) by Yalcin and Zorlu, 146 in which women with screens ≥ 7.2 mmol/l were given a GTT, reported sensitivities of 98% and 88%, specificities of 44% and 85%, and PPVs of 32% and 9%, using thresholds of ≥ 7.5 and ≥ 7.8 mmol/l, respectively.Meriggi and co-workers, 149 in a selected population, contrasted the GCT using different blood and plasma thresholds. The plasma levels were lower but yielded similar results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is postulated that rejuvenation or regeneration of beta cells of the pancreas may be taking place, which may increase utilization and metabolism of glucose in peripheral tissues, liver, and adipose tissues through enzymatic processes. [ 33 34 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%