2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capitalization by formalization? – Challenging the current paradigm of land reforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While the property rights theorists see private land titles as the natural and logical culmination of an ongoing process of rights individualization, de Soto sees state rights provision of titles as a necessary and desirable step in pushing the process of evolution along [5]. In brief, de Soto's agenda could be described with the words "capitalization by formalization" [6].…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While the property rights theorists see private land titles as the natural and logical culmination of an ongoing process of rights individualization, de Soto sees state rights provision of titles as a necessary and desirable step in pushing the process of evolution along [5]. In brief, de Soto's agenda could be described with the words "capitalization by formalization" [6].…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A share of the differential rent may turn into an absolute rent if land gets so scarce that even marginal land can earn a rent. The theory about differential rents was originally created for agricultural land, but can be applied to any kind of land if certain modifications are made [6]. Neither differential rents nor absolute rents can be tackled by market entry of new actors or by an extension of supply of land (exception: more land conversion) and has therefore a semi-monopolistic character [16].…”
Section: Latin: Usus Fructusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations