2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon and nutrient biological removal in a University of Cape Town membrane bioreactor: Analysis of a pilot plant operated under two different C/N ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decades, biological nutrient removal (BNR) processes have been thoroughly explored, since they avoid the use of chemicals and consequently chemical sludge disposal issues [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last decades, biological nutrient removal (BNR) processes have been thoroughly explored, since they avoid the use of chemicals and consequently chemical sludge disposal issues [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IFAS-MBR pilot plant was realized according to the UCT scheme [3,22]: it consisted of one anaerobic (volume 62 L), one anoxic (volume 102 L) and one aerobic (volume 211 L) in-series reactors. The schematic layout of the UCT-IFAS-MBR pilot plant is depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Pilot Plant Operation and Experimental Campaign Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrification (g nit ), denitrification (g denit ) and nitrogen (g total ) removal efficiencies were evaluated according to the following expressions (Mannina et al, 2016e;Wagner et al, 2015): Q RAS ODR Fig. 1.…”
Section: Pilot Plant Removal Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-parameter probe provided the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration as well as pH value in each reactor. Referring to the COD removal, both the biological removal and the total removal (after membrane filtration) were assessed according to Mannina et al (2016a). Periodic tests on carrier samples were carried out, in order to evaluate the biofilm growth, in according to previously reported methods (Di Trapani et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%