2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technological innovation system in China: Structure, function evaluation and policy implication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Because it is feasible with current technologies, reducing the risks for the implementation of new technologies, oxy-fuel combustion has been deemed a promising technology to reduce CO 2 emissions from coal-fired power stations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is feasible with current technologies, reducing the risks for the implementation of new technologies, oxy-fuel combustion has been deemed a promising technology to reduce CO 2 emissions from coal-fired power stations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon dioxide capture and sequestration (CCS), which first appeared in China's 11th Five Year Plan (FYP), is regarded as one of the promising options of clean coal technology Yuan and Zuo, 2011). It is assumed that China will enhance its endeavour to develop CCS (Liang et al, 2011;Li et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2013) Technology (Lai et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012 (27) 2011 (48) 2010 (31) 2009 (42) 2008 (7) 2007 (5) Query "CCS" AND "China" AND ("CO2" OR "capture" OR "greenhouse") in Scopus as of October 2014…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…roadmaps for CCS such as in [24,25] or strategic issues and policy measures such as in [26][27][28] were explored. However, these sources do not include different assessment dimensions in their roadmaps, resulting in an integrated view; nor do they attempt to scientifically verify the storage capacities that are implicitly assumed as the basis for their assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%