2017
DOI: 10.1017/jpa.2017.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbonaceous and siliceous Neoproterozoic vase-shaped microfossils (Urucum Formation, Brazil) and the question of early protistan biomineralization

Abstract: Abstract.-Vase-shaped microfossils (VSMs) occur in dolomitic extraclasts of indeterminate provenance within the basal diamictite of the Neoproterozoic Urucum Formation (Jacadigo Group) of west-central Brazil, having an age constrained between 889 ± 44 Ma (K-Ar; basement rocks) and 587 ± 7 Ma ( 40 Ar/ 39

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
62
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
6
62
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of the emerging Proterozoic biomarker patterns, fossil evidence for diverse eukaryotic assemblages from multiple locations, including phytoplankton and heterotrophic protists, is also found in the early‐mid Neoproterozoic from about 850 Ma and younger (Butterfield, Knoll, & Swett, ; Knoll, ; Knoll, Javaux, Hewitt, & Cohen, ; Morais et al, ; Porter & Knoll, ; Strauss et al, ). Microfossil analysis is best suited for detecting the earliest eukaryotes in the geological record, but it is difficult to use this approach to semi‐quantitatively assess the eukaryotic abundance relative to bacterial source inputs and relative to the total sedimentary organic matter pool, since the dominant sedimentary organic matter component is amorphous kerogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In support of the emerging Proterozoic biomarker patterns, fossil evidence for diverse eukaryotic assemblages from multiple locations, including phytoplankton and heterotrophic protists, is also found in the early‐mid Neoproterozoic from about 850 Ma and younger (Butterfield, Knoll, & Swett, ; Knoll, ; Knoll, Javaux, Hewitt, & Cohen, ; Morais et al, ; Porter & Knoll, ; Strauss et al, ). Microfossil analysis is best suited for detecting the earliest eukaryotes in the geological record, but it is difficult to use this approach to semi‐quantitatively assess the eukaryotic abundance relative to bacterial source inputs and relative to the total sedimentary organic matter pool, since the dominant sedimentary organic matter component is amorphous kerogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…, Mayama and Kuriyama , Morais et al. ). The most well‐known protists forming mineral structures are diatoms (Martin‐Jezequel et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a lack of structures that could be preserved in sediment leads to a very limited fossil record in protists, which also constrains the proper calibration of phylogenetic analyses (Roger and Hug 2006). Nevertheless, some protist lineages are able to produce minerals preserved in fossil layers by a process of biomineralization (e.g., Bovee 1981, Henriksen et al 1993, Mayama and Kuriyama 2002, Morais et al 2017. The most well-known protists forming mineral structures are diatoms (Martin-Jezequel et al 2000); though, several other clades in Stramenopiles are capable of creating extraordinarily diverse biomineralized structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vase-shaped tests are widespread and abundant in marine sediments of the later Tonian Period (ca. 800-725 million years ago) [31][32][33][34]. Most of these fossils show a combination of characters suggestive of amoebozoan affinities, including some populations that closely resemble the tests of extant Arcella species [31].…”
Section: And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%