Career Development and Gender Pay Disparities in State Employment in Greece

Abstract

Much existing western-based literature on gender argues that deregulated institutional mechanisms have a detrimental impact on gender segregation and pay differentials. However, there is little empirical evidence to confirm the opposite in highly regulated systems such as those in Greece, even though there are strong reasons to suggest that it may be quite different here because of the unusual gender division of labour and endemic patriarchal norms. An apt example of this is national state employment in which centrally determined work processes reflect societal discriminatory structures. This article examines the impact of institutions on career development and its potential effects on gender pay disparities in state employment in Greece. It attempts to achieve this by exploring the extent to which rule-based systems may overturn gender bias in one public organization in Greece. The study suggests that exogenous parameters may shape centrally imposed institutional frameworks both in terms of facilitating and hindering career progression and thus pay.

From evidence to action: Applying gender mainstreaming to pay gaps in the Welsh public sector

“…This was an encouraging finding, demonstrating that in this set of public sector organizations women had the potential to gain part-time employment in higher level positions. Nevertheless, as demonstrated in previous research (Jones & Torrie, 2009;Koskina, 2009), men were over-represented in all cases in the highest grades, so this prompted further qualitative work and a series of actions in line with the change management phase of the research (see below). Across the board, the majority of full-time and part-time jobs were offered as permanent contracts, although men were overrepresented in their share of these full-time and permanent premium employment opportunities.…”

A hidden deterioration in equal pay achievements?

“…Some researchers have attempted to explain the pay gap by examining various factors, including personality and attitudes (Le et al , 2011), perceptions (Khoreva, 2011), the employment sector (Aláez-Aller et al , 2011), institutions and systems (Koskina, 2009) and culture (Davidson et al , 2012). However, the gender pay gap has not been fully explained, as it is seemingly a multi-semantic and complicated phenomenon.…”

Right time to join? Organizational imprinting and women's careers in public service organizations

“…Despite decades of research demonstrating the disadvantage women experience in progressing within the workplace, calls for improved understandings of the determinants of women's career trajectories persist (Acker, 2009; Broadbridge & Simpson, 2011; Caceres‐Rodriguez, 2013; Cornelius & Skinner, 2008; Inkson, 1995; Linehan & Walsh, 2000; Sabelis & Schilling, 2013). It is argued that we need further analysis that captures career dynamics in order to better explain why women are continuing to experience challenges in the workplace in the form of pay gaps, glass ceilings, glass cliffs, and now even glass chains (Arifeen & Gatrell, 2020; Elsaid & Ursel, 2018; Koskina, 2009; Main & Gregory‐Smith, 2018; Ryan et al., 2016). Despite scholars' best efforts, the complex mix of societal, organizational, and individual variables makes generating insights into career opportunities and benefits as they develop over time a difficult task.…”