2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61030-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case-Based Team Recognition Using Learned Opponent Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We briefly summarize these efforts. Additional details can be found, for example, in Floyd, Karneeb, and Aha (2017) and Karneeb et al (2018).…”
Section: Oceanserveriver2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We briefly summarize these efforts. Additional details can be found, for example, in Floyd, Karneeb, and Aha (2017) and Karneeb et al (2018).…”
Section: Oceanserveriver2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), as well as the group formation. Floyd et al (2017) also use simulations to bootstrap a case-based reasoning system for identifying and classifying enemy combatants engaged in beyond-visual-range air combat. In some cases, generative models can become very elaborate, as with Shen and How (2019a), where Markov decision processes are specified for both adversarial and neutral agents, along with rationality and deception parameters.…”
Section: Goal-based Generative Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, it is possible to extract the typical characteristics of aerial targets from the chaotic intelligence information, and then recognize their combat intentions. The existing research methods of targets intention recognition mainly include template matching method [4], expert system method [5]- [7], decision tree [8]- [9], Bayesian network [10]- [12] and neural network [13]- [15]. Floyd et al [4] applies the template matching method to combat intention recognition in beyond-visual-range air combat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing research methods of targets intention recognition mainly include template matching method [4], expert system method [5]- [7], decision tree [8]- [9], Bayesian network [10]- [12] and neural network [13]- [15]. Floyd et al [4] applies the template matching method to combat intention recognition in beyond-visual-range air combat. Ben-Bassat and Freedy [5] evaluates military situation by integrating knowledge requirements and management into expert decision support systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%