2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2588611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cashback is Cash Forward: Delaying a Discount to Increase Future Spending

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they did trigger increased total coupling and mental discounting (as measured by perceived costs) in relation to standard discounts. Most notably, we see results consistent with Vana, Lambrecht, and Bertini (2017), who focus on Purchase 2: we find that consumers who receive a cash-back promotion mentally discount a portion of that promotion from their Purchase 2 (and simultaneously increase coupling with Purchase 2). Thus, although cash back appears to induce mental discounting, especially when it is linked temporally with spending, it does not do so to the same degree as promotional credit, for which coupling across purchases is the strongest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they did trigger increased total coupling and mental discounting (as measured by perceived costs) in relation to standard discounts. Most notably, we see results consistent with Vana, Lambrecht, and Bertini (2017), who focus on Purchase 2: we find that consumers who receive a cash-back promotion mentally discount a portion of that promotion from their Purchase 2 (and simultaneously increase coupling with Purchase 2). Thus, although cash back appears to induce mental discounting, especially when it is linked temporally with spending, it does not do so to the same degree as promotional credit, for which coupling across purchases is the strongest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Recent empirical research has closely examined “cash-back” price promotions (Vana, Lambrecht, and Bertini 2017), in which customers make an initial purchase and then receive a portion of that purchase amount as “cash back” in their bank account. Relative to no price promotion, consumers may increase spending both for an initial purchase when accepting a cash-back offer (Dhar, Morrison, and Raju 1996; Raju, Dhar, and Morrison 1994) and for a subsequent purchase on receipt of cash back in their bank account (Vana, Lambrecht, and Bertini 2017). Indeed, Vana, Lambrecht, and Bertini (2017) document an increase in spending in the time period following receipt of the cash back.…”
Section: Conceptual Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vana, Lambrecht, and Bertini () shows that cashback payments increase the likelihood of repeated purchases and their behaviour its significantly different from those without it, as they make not only more diverse transactions but also with higher weight in categories that require economic investment. While click/visit transactions and search generate cashback do not need a financial outlay by the customer, purchase transactions require some kind of acquisition.…”
Section: Theoretical Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, some researchers have concluded that although online shopping has provided a new international landscape to conduct business, the use of this medium and the absence of face-to-face interactions has presented the law with numerous challenges in terms of the scope of consumer protection [41].Some researchers investigated the impact of factors affecting consumers' trust in online product reviews and suggest that both argument quality and perceived similarity contribute to increased trust, but in varying degrees [42]. Moreover, in the case of payments that are automatically processed, such as online cashback, a benefit of separating a discount payment from the purchase event may arise out of positive spillover effects on future purchases rather than from imperfect redemption behavior [43].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%