2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell–matrix interactions regulate mesenchymal stem cell response to hydrostatic pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
60
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Articular cartilage is a multiphasic tissue, the solid phase of which is composed predominately of a collagen (mainly type II) fibrillar network (around 10-22% by wet weight) enmeshing proteoglycan macromolecules (2-7% by wet weight) (Maroudas et al, 1969;Muir et al, 1970;Bayliss and Ali, 1978;Inerot et al, 1978;Maroudas et al, 1980;Zirn et al, 1984;Mow et al, 1992;Rieppo et al, 2009;Gannon et al, 2012). Previous studies have demonstrated that the application of dynamic compression (Huang et al, 2010;Bian et al, 2012;Thorpe et al, 2013) or hydrostatic pressure (Miyanishi et al, 2006;Wagner et al, 2008;Ogawa et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2010;Meyer et al, 2011;Correia et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2012;Steward et al, 2012;Vinardell et al, 2012a;Liu et al, 2013) can enhance the sGAG and collagen content as well as the mechanical functionality of cartilage constructs engineered using MSCs. However, these studies often fail to produce cartilage grafts with mechanical functionality or ECM content approaching that of native cartilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Articular cartilage is a multiphasic tissue, the solid phase of which is composed predominately of a collagen (mainly type II) fibrillar network (around 10-22% by wet weight) enmeshing proteoglycan macromolecules (2-7% by wet weight) (Maroudas et al, 1969;Muir et al, 1970;Bayliss and Ali, 1978;Inerot et al, 1978;Maroudas et al, 1980;Zirn et al, 1984;Mow et al, 1992;Rieppo et al, 2009;Gannon et al, 2012). Previous studies have demonstrated that the application of dynamic compression (Huang et al, 2010;Bian et al, 2012;Thorpe et al, 2013) or hydrostatic pressure (Miyanishi et al, 2006;Wagner et al, 2008;Ogawa et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2010;Meyer et al, 2011;Correia et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2012;Steward et al, 2012;Vinardell et al, 2012a;Liu et al, 2013) can enhance the sGAG and collagen content as well as the mechanical functionality of cartilage constructs engineered using MSCs. However, these studies often fail to produce cartilage grafts with mechanical functionality or ECM content approaching that of native cartilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical signals, such as hydrostatic pressure (HP), are a key component of the in vivo joint environment and have been shown to play a significant role in regulating the chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Previous studies have shown varying and occasionally conflicting results (Parkkinen et al, 1993;Carver and Heath, 1999;Suh et al, 1999;Carver and Heath, 2000;Jortikka et al, 2000;Smith et al, 2000Smith et al, , 2005Hu and Athanasiou, 2006;Finger et al, 2007;Ogawa et al, 2009;Meyer et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2012;Maxson and Burg, 2012;Puetzer et al, 2012;Safshekan et al, 2012;Steward et al, 2012;Vinardell et al, 2012a;Steward et al, 2013), but it would appear that the application of physiological levels (3-10 MPa) of intermittent HP can enhance proteoglygan and collagen synthesis and upregulate aggrecan and collagen II mRNA expression in chondrocytes and stem/progenitor cells isolated from bone marrow, synovial tissues and adipose tissues. There is also evidence to suggest that dynamic HP can act to stabilise the phenotype of chondrogenically primed joint tissue derived MSCs (Vinardell et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subcutaneous environment differs in a number of notable ways to the orthotopic environment. Mechanical cues, absent in the subcutaneous environment, such as hydrostatic pressure [59][60] and dynamic compression [61][62] have been shown to play a role in regulating the endochondral phenotype of MSCs as well as matrix production [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple soluble and insoluble cues are known to regulate the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), although we are only beginning to understand how these factors interact to regulate cell fate Engler et al, 2006;Kelly and Jacobs, 2010;McBeath et al, 2004;Steward et al, 2011;Thorpe et al, 2012). The matrix or substrate stiffness has been shown to play a role in regulating the differentiation of MSCs down specific lineages in both 2D (Engler et al, 2006;Park et al, 2011) and 3D environments (Huebsch et al, 2010;Parekh et al, 2011;Pek et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%