2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell phones and brain tumors: a review including the long-term epidemiologic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
120
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
120
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, this may lead to disease. During the past twenty years, the growing use of mobile phones (MP) has aroused great concern regarding the health effects of exposure to the EMR (Kundi et al, 2004, Khurana et al, 2009). Dual-band phones can cover GSM networks in pairs such as 900 and 1800 MHz frequencies (Europe, Asia, Australia, and Brazil) or 850 and 1900 MHz (North America and Brazil).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, this may lead to disease. During the past twenty years, the growing use of mobile phones (MP) has aroused great concern regarding the health effects of exposure to the EMR (Kundi et al, 2004, Khurana et al, 2009). Dual-band phones can cover GSM networks in pairs such as 900 and 1800 MHz frequencies (Europe, Asia, Australia, and Brazil) or 850 and 1900 MHz (North America and Brazil).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it reports selectively chosen data from Hardell's 2006 papers, including his pooled-analyses [1,2] referred to subjects with 5 year latency but does not highlight, for those with 10 year latency, the much more significant data on increases of ipsilateral head tumour risk, although these are clearly indicated in Hardell's papers. Besides, it does not consider the recent studies by Hardell [3,[35][36][37] or those of Interphone [22,24,29,31,32] which report s.s. increases of ipsilateral head tumour risk after 10-year latency or use of cellular phones ( Table 2). Consequently, the Ahlbom metaanalysis gives results that lack any indication of head tumour risk from MP use or latency up to 10 years (Table 3), emphasising the complete incompatibility between the two data sources: 83% of Hardell's risk data (OR) are > 1, of which 43% are s.s., while the Interphone data are largely (73%) < 1, of which 11% are s.s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Indeed, by splitting the overall risk data of these meta-analyses according to their source, only Hardell's data are systematically above 1 (90-100%), of which 50-90% are s.s., whereas Interphone data include 50-70% of risk values below 1, a proportion of which (up to over 20%) are s.s. Moreover, when only ipsilateral data are considered [37], even 100% of the Interphone risk values are above 1, of which 29% are s.s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No further attempt was made to character ize the health effects of the electromagnetic fi elds. For a dis cussion of health issues that goes beyond the SAR value, the interested reader is referred to [23,24]. The SAR uncertainties from effects of age-dependent tissue variations [11], posture, and anatomical variations [18,25] have been studied previ ously, and are beyond the scope of the current analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%