2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-002-0530-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular neural network to detect spurious vectors in PIV data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ANNs are increasingly being applied to pattern-recognition problems, and their application has been extended to include particle-image velocimetry and other, similar techniques [17,24,20]. The authors in [6] applied ANNs to generate wave equations from hydraulic data, whereas [8,25] used ANNs for turbulent eddy classification and the detection of eddy patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…ANNs are increasingly being applied to pattern-recognition problems, and their application has been extended to include particle-image velocimetry and other, similar techniques [17,24,20]. The authors in [6] applied ANNs to generate wave equations from hydraulic data, whereas [8,25] used ANNs for turbulent eddy classification and the detection of eddy patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This method focuses on patterns (triangles or tetrahedrons) rather than individual particles, and becomes time consuming as particle number becomes large. A recent alternative is the cellular neural network (CNN) method based on the cross-correlation algorithm (Liang et al 2003). This technique, by simulating human brain procedure, is only suitable for measured vectors distributed on evenly spaced, structurally discrete points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…detection of the outliers, 2) replacement of the incorrect and missing values, and 3) data smoothing. Outlier identification is the most critical procedure and has been the subject matter of several recent papers (Hart 2000;Liang et al 2003;Liu et al 2008;Pun et al 2007;Shinneeb et al 2004;Westerweel et al 2005). The most common validation techniques proposed in standard commercial software are the global histogram filter, the dynamic mean value operator and the normalized median test (Raffel et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common validation techniques proposed in standard commercial software are the global histogram filter, the dynamic mean value operator and the normalized median test (Raffel et al 2007). Alternative processes based on cellular neural network or bootstrapping have also been shown to provide satisfactory detections but they are relatively time-consuming (Liang et al 2003;Pun et al 2007) and rarely used in practice. Most of the current outlier detectors require the use of thresholding parameters whose selection remains somewhat arbitrary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%