2004
DOI: 10.1265/jjh.59.383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular Phone Dependence Tendency of Female University Students

Abstract: These findings suggest that the CPDQ is a useful scale for rating cellular phone dependence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our goal was also to contribute to increasing social awareness of the health problems associated with the use of these devices. Toda et al [7] have developed a cellular phone dependence questionnaire (CPDQ) to perform a similar study, but their project involved only female university students and had several limitations. These authors did not generally exclude a possibility of increased health risk due to MP use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal was also to contribute to increasing social awareness of the health problems associated with the use of these devices. Toda et al [7] have developed a cellular phone dependence questionnaire (CPDQ) to perform a similar study, but their project involved only female university students and had several limitations. These authors did not generally exclude a possibility of increased health risk due to MP use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Those that are available have involved quite disparate conceptual language to describe the problem, such as dependence, 16 problem use, 1,10,15,17,18 excessive use or overuse, 14,19,20 addictive use, 12,21 or experiences related with mobile phone use 22 or mobile phone involvement. 23 On the whole, the estimated levels of MPPU range from 0% to 38%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The estimated prevalence of MPPU in adolescence ranges between 5.57% 22 and 33%. 19 This diversity in estimate reflects the various scales used in the studies, variations in the concepts being applied, as well as the different sources being used to develop the scales (substance abuse, gambling, and others): the Cellular Phone Dependence Questionnaire (CPDQ 16 20 or the upper and lower 30% to distinguish between excessive and habitual users. 19 Only one study has tried to establish a cut-off point of the problematic user 3 by means of classification function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partir de 2004 se inició el estudio del uso del teléfo-no móvil como dependencia tecnológica con el desarrollo del primer instrumento de medida (Toda, Monden, Kubo y Morimoto, 2004). En Europa, la alerta parte de Muñoz-Rivas y Agustín (2005), quienes detectaron una alta frecuencia de "adictos al móvil" en la práctica de la psicología clínica, situando la juventud y adolescencia como grupos en riesgo por no tener un completo control de los impulsos y haber aceptado el móvil como símbolo de estatus.…”
unclassified
“…Sin embargo, apenas se observan publicaciones centradas en esta tecnología entre 1996 y 2005; podemos decir, pues, que Carbonell, Guardiola, Beranuy y Bellés (2009) hallan un 2.2% de publicaciones y existe poca investigación psicológica sobre este fenómeno (Laramie, 2007) y escasas escalas que permitan su medición (véase tabla 1). Toda, et al (2004) desarrollaron el primer cuestionario, el Cellular Phone Dependence Questionnaire (CPDQ), destinado a población universitaria y Kawasaki et al (2006) confirmaron su validez en estudiantes de secundaria. Bianchi y Phillips (2005) construyeron el Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale (MPPUS) para población adulta; detectando que los más jóvenes, extravertidos y con menor autoestima presentaban un patrón de uso más desadaptado.…”
unclassified