2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellulose nanofiber network for moisture stable, strong and ductile biocomposites and increased epoxy curing rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
130
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
12
130
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If compared to other BC or CNF reinforced composites we note that especially the Young's modulus obtained for the GGM modified CNF nanopaper laminates exceeded most of the previously reported results, but the tensile strength was average. Other groups reported much higher values (Ansari et al 2014;Henriksson et al 2008;Sehaqui et al 2010;Zhou et al 2009), but since these have been obtained for thin nanopapers of chemically pre-treated CNF, they are not fully comparable to the results presented here. The nanopaper properties determine the properties of the final nanopaper based multi-layer composites, allowing predicting the composites properties.…”
Section: Multi-layer Epoxy-nanopaper Compositescontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If compared to other BC or CNF reinforced composites we note that especially the Young's modulus obtained for the GGM modified CNF nanopaper laminates exceeded most of the previously reported results, but the tensile strength was average. Other groups reported much higher values (Ansari et al 2014;Henriksson et al 2008;Sehaqui et al 2010;Zhou et al 2009), but since these have been obtained for thin nanopapers of chemically pre-treated CNF, they are not fully comparable to the results presented here. The nanopaper properties determine the properties of the final nanopaper based multi-layer composites, allowing predicting the composites properties.…”
Section: Multi-layer Epoxy-nanopaper Compositescontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The use of nanopapers as reinforcement for polymers was first demonstrated by Yano Nakagaito and Yano 2005). Henriksson and Berglund (2007) later prepared nanopaper-composites with a water-soluble melamine-formaldehyde resin while Lee et al (2012c), Ansari et al (2014) and Aitomäki et al (2016) manufactured epoxy composites by vacuum infusion and impregnation, respectively. However, as of yet, not much research has focused on the effect of the nanopaper properties on composite properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the average value of the rubbery moduli (E r : the storage modulus above T g ) measured at 90°C for the composites containing CNC-coated GF were lower than that of the composite incorporating uncoated GF, due to the large standard deviation in measured properties, it was concluded that coating of the GF with CNC did not impact the rubbery modulus. Studies have shown that addition of CNC in the epoxy increased the rubbery modulus due to the formation of a network of mechanically percolated CNC [16,18,21]. However, it is expected that CNC on the surface of the GF do not form a percolated network within the polymer matrix.…”
Section: Dynamic Thermo-mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most epoxy systems, obtaining well dispersed CNs in epoxies has been exceedingly challenging, especially for high CN volume fraction [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. To address this issues, waterborne epoxies [14,15,18], solvent exchange methods [20,21], CN preforms impregnation [22] and chemical modification of CN surfaces have been used [23], however, the time and cost involved in these processes limit their capability in industrial scale production of GF/epoxy composites. An alternative approach has been to add CNs to GF/ epoxy composites by coating the GF prior to mixing into epoxy, where the CN coating modifies the GF/ epoxy interface and subsequently improves the properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pulp composites, a diameter of 27 lm and a length of 1.3 mm were used. The effective stiffness of CNF (E f;l ) was calculated using the method of Ansari et al (2014), through the Halpin-Tsai model.…”
Section: Tensile Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%