2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a retrospective review of 73 patients who underwent MRI-fusion biopsy by Tan et al, 26 CZ lesions were graded as PIRADS 3 or greater. Only two (7.7%) of these suspicious lesions harbored PCa ( 34 ). Since evidence suggests PCa arising from the CZ can be more aggressive than peripheral and transitional zone cancers, modification of the PIRADS algorithm may be needed to better characterize CZ lesions ( 35 , 36 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retrospective review of 73 patients who underwent MRI-fusion biopsy by Tan et al, 26 CZ lesions were graded as PIRADS 3 or greater. Only two (7.7%) of these suspicious lesions harbored PCa ( 34 ). Since evidence suggests PCa arising from the CZ can be more aggressive than peripheral and transitional zone cancers, modification of the PIRADS algorithm may be needed to better characterize CZ lesions ( 35 , 36 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed an Institution Review Board (IRB) approved retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected and maintained database consisting of all patients undergoing mpMRI transrectal ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsy performed by a single urologist (LAD) for clinical features concerning the presence of prostate cancer. mpMRI of the prostate was performed using a Siemens MAGNETOM 3T machine (Munich, Germany) as previously described (8). Each MRI scan was reviewed and reported by an attending radiologist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is concern that central zone (CZ) lesions may not be accurately characterized when using the PIRADS algorithm. In a review of 73 patients who underwent MRI-fusion biopsy, only two (7.7%) of 26 CZ lesions that were designated PIRADS ≥3 actually contained clinically-significant disease ( 42 ). Since there is evidence to suggest PCa originating from the CZ can be more aggressive, relying on the PIRADS score alone may overcall lesions and lead to unnecessary confirmatory biopsy sessions ( 43 , 44 ).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%