1997
DOI: 10.1002/anie.199706231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[(CF3)2Hg(μ‐F)2Hg(CF3)2]2−: Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity

Abstract: 3] The inner reorganization energy is the amount of energy needed for the reorganization of all intramolecular coordinates during the ET process according to Marcus theory [4] S. F. Nelsen. J Adamus. [6] This rollows t'rom detailed cyclovoltammetric measurements on 3: B. Speiser, R Mayer. M Wurde, Universitit Tubingen, private communication; M. Wurde. Diplimu Tho.si.s. Universitit Tubingen, 1996. For the oxidation of 3, see also R U: Johnson.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These Hg−F distances are slightly longer than those found in [ II -μ 2 -F] - [2.589(2) Å], which possesses a less sterically hindered and possibly more Lewis acidic Hg center. Nevertheless, they remain within the range observed in other complexes such as [(CF 3 ) 2 Hg(μ 2 -F) 2 Hg(CF 3 ) 2 ] 2- (2.39 and 2.42 Å) or the fluoride adduct of a tetranuclear mercuracarborand (2.56 and 2.65 Å) . In comparison to [ II -μ 2 -F] - , it is also interesting to note that the longer Hg−F distances observed in [ 4 -μ 2 -F] correlate, as expected, with a smaller 1 J Hg - F .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These Hg−F distances are slightly longer than those found in [ II -μ 2 -F] - [2.589(2) Å], which possesses a less sterically hindered and possibly more Lewis acidic Hg center. Nevertheless, they remain within the range observed in other complexes such as [(CF 3 ) 2 Hg(μ 2 -F) 2 Hg(CF 3 ) 2 ] 2- (2.39 and 2.42 Å) or the fluoride adduct of a tetranuclear mercuracarborand (2.56 and 2.65 Å) . In comparison to [ II -μ 2 -F] - , it is also interesting to note that the longer Hg−F distances observed in [ 4 -μ 2 -F] correlate, as expected, with a smaller 1 J Hg - F .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…[11] The importance of this electronic effect is nicely illustrated by the relative halophilicity of 1 and that of its nonfluorinated analogue trimeric ortho-phenylenemercury ([(o-C 6 H 4 Hg) 3 ]). [11] The importance of this electronic effect is nicely illustrated by the relative halophilicity of 1 and that of its nonfluorinated analogue trimeric ortho-phenylenemercury ([(o-C 6 H 4 Hg) 3 ]).…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast the fluoro analogue RuHX(CO)(PBu t 2 Me) 2 displays reactivity at both the Ru-H and the Ru-F bonds. 220 Tetrameric [RuF(µ-F)(CO) 3 ] 4 (258) is one of the earlier carbonyl fluorides to be structurally characterized. Compound 258 is isolated on reaction of ruthenium pentafluoride with carbon monoxide.…”
Section: A Ruthenium and Osmiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of fluoride ion in 308 leads to labilization of the Hg-C(CF 3 ) bond. 258 In contrast Hg(CF 3 ) 2 cannot be used for nucleophilic transfer of CF 3 -due to the very strong Hg-C bond.…”
Section: Groups 11 and 12mentioning
confidence: 99%