Chacal ou Cordeiro? O Brasil frente aos desafios e oportunidades do Sistema Internacional

Rodriguez, Júlio César Cossio

doi:10.1590/s0034-73292012000200005

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They are no longer confined to their regional hegemon, and can pick alternative leaders from a menu of global powers. Multipolarity thus broadens the autonomy of both small states and middle powers, as has been shown to be the case with Brazil (Rodriguez, 2012). Yet, as Brazil loosened itself from Washington's grip, so did other South American states from Brasilia's (Malamud, 2011:10-5).…”

Section: Policy-making: Brazil and The Transformation Of Regional Coomentioning

confidence: 84%

Latin American Regionalism Faces the Rise of Brazil

Malamud¹

2016

Foreign Policy Responses to the Rise of Brazil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Policy-making: Brazil and The Transformation Of Regional Coomentioning

confidence: 84%

Latin American Regionalism Faces the Rise of Brazil

Malamud¹

2016

Foreign Policy Responses to the Rise of Brazil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Um exemplo disso vem de Amorim Neto e Malamud (2015), quando consideram o CINC uma das variáveis que determinam o padrão de votação de Argentina, Brasil e México na Assembleia Geral da Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU). O realismo waltziano também já foi referencial teórico para estudos sobre a política externa colombiana (FLEMES, 2012), chilena, peruana (VALENCIA; RUCALVABA, 2015), argentina (SCHENONI; ACTIS, 2014) e brasileira (RODRIGUEZ, 2012). Sobre o último, o Brasil, e a maneira com que ele se distancia dos demais países da região, serve como parâmetro para a operacionalização dos indicadores propostos neste artigo.…”

Section: Fórmulas De Poder Para a América Do Sulunclassified

Abordagens conceituais e implicações práticas na construção de indicadores de poder estatal para a América do Sul

Souza

Batista

Oliveira

2022

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Polít.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo: As especificações conceituais são importantes para identificação dos atributos que compõem um fenômeno político, mas é a operacionalização que permite a mensuração empírica. De modo a entender as implicações práticas de abordagens teóricas sobre o poder e como elas se traduzem em aferições com diferentes leituras da realidade, este trabalho discute versões de um indicador de poder regional sul-americano, o Relevance Index for South American Politics (RISAmP). A partir das perspectivas (I) material, que considera o poder como a posse de recursos, e (II) relacional, que compreende o poder como um fenômeno político e social relativo, foi possível conceber variações dos elementos duros e brandos, e suas aplicações relativas e brutas, gerando efeitos objetivos na construção de um indicador unificado que avalia a performance dos países no período 1990-2018. O desafio superado foi o de minimizar as discrepâncias apresentadas pelo Brasil e equilibrar as variáveis para que o indicador final correspondesse ao que se observa nas relações interestatais da América do Sul. Espera-se que os termos aqui apresentados possam ser aproveitados, adequados, ou sirvam como estímulo para estudos que busquem coesão entre conceitos e instrumentos de medição, entre a teoria e a prática.

show abstract

“…Brazil's foreign policy since 1946 can be described as a permanent quest for autonomy, but with distinct contours for different environments (Rodríguez 2012). Although foreign policy during the Cold War can be characterized as a bid for "autonomy through distance" in regard to foreign powers and regional rivals, in the decade after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the country's diplomacy was distinguished by "autonomy through participation" in international institutions and regional organizations (Fonseca 2004).…”

Section: Argentinamentioning

confidence: 99%

What Determines Foreign Policy in Latin America? Systemic versus Domestic Factors in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, 1946–2008

Neto¹,

Malamud

2015

Lat. Am. polit. soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Is it domestic politics or the international system that more decisively influences foreign policy? This article focuses on Latin America's three largest powers to identify patterns and compare outcomes in their relations with the regional hegemon, the United States. Through a statistical analysis of voting behavior in the UN General Assembly, we examine systemic variables (both realist and liberal) and domestic variables (institutional, ideological, and bureaucratic) to determine their relative weights between 1946 and 2008. The study includes 4,900 votes, the tabulation of 1,500 ministers according to their ideological persuasion, all annual trade entries, and an assessment of the political strength of presidents, cabinets, and parties per year. The findings show that while Argentina's voting behavior has been determined mostly by domestic factors and Mexico's by realist systemic ones, Brazil's has a more complex blend of determinants, but also with a prevalence of realist systemic variables.T he emergence of left-leaning governments throughout Latin America, the socalled Pink Tide, has become conspicuous in recent years. As a consequence of the pervading ideology of the new administrations, "one would expect a more assertive approach to foreign policy" (Gardini and Lambert 2011, 1). This scenario provides a good opportunity to perform a test: to evaluate the relative weights of systemic and domestic variables. Since the United States has been traditionally the antimodel and antagonist for the Latin American left-as much as a reference and ally for the right-we posit that focusing on a country's alignment with the United States is a proper way to gauge the impact of ideology and related domestic factors, such as regime type, on foreign policy. From a more general perspective, this strategy can inform us as to whether it is systemic or domestic forces that have more decisively influenced Latin American foreign policy.

show abstract

Chacal ou Cordeiro? O Brasil frente aos desafios e oportunidades do Sistema Internacional

Cited by 10 publications

References 27 publications

Latin American Regionalism Faces the Rise of Brazil

Latin American Regionalism Faces the Rise of Brazil

Abordagens conceituais e implicações práticas na construção de indicadores de poder estatal para a América do Sul

What Determines Foreign Policy in Latin America? Systemic versus Domestic Factors in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, 1946–2008

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About