2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10663-010-9125-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in the Austrian structure of wages, 1996–2002: evidence from linked employer-employee data

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, wage dispersion falls in Hungary, Ireland and Spain. Finally, and as also pointed out by Pointner and Stiglbauer (), no change is observed in Austria. Specifically, the latter authors find that wage compression in Spain, Hungary and Ireland is driven by market factors (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…By contrast, wage dispersion falls in Hungary, Ireland and Spain. Finally, and as also pointed out by Pointner and Stiglbauer (), no change is observed in Austria. Specifically, the latter authors find that wage compression in Spain, Hungary and Ireland is driven by market factors (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, women still experience negative outcomes in the workplace due to their gender, such as significant wage disparity. Pointner and Stiglbauer (2010) implement the Machado and Mata (2005) counterfactual decomposition technique, finding that compositional effects due to gender, education level, age, and market‐driven effects (such as changes in the rate of return and changes in workplace characteristics) all lead to higher wage dispersion. Fersterer and Winter‐Ebmer (2003), Pointner and Stiglbauer (2010), and Akay and Oskonbaeva (2019) also document negative outcomes for women in the workplace despite moves towards gender diversity.…”
Section: Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%