1990
DOI: 10.1070/pu1990v033n12abeh002665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channeling of fast particles and associated phenomena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the following values: v t = 11.6 · 10 5 cm/s [9] and U Figure 2 demonstrates that the parameters p and N vary in wide ranges: N = 1...100, p = 0.1 − 500 for projectile positron and p = 0.001 − 0.1 for proton. The upper limiting values of p's are larger by more than an order of magnitude than those accessible in the undulators based on the motion of the charged particles in periodic magnetic fields and also those in the field of the laser radiation [2], [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We used the following values: v t = 11.6 · 10 5 cm/s [9] and U Figure 2 demonstrates that the parameters p and N vary in wide ranges: N = 1...100, p = 0.1 − 500 for projectile positron and p = 0.001 − 0.1 for proton. The upper limiting values of p's are larger by more than an order of magnitude than those accessible in the undulators based on the motion of the charged particles in periodic magnetic fields and also those in the field of the laser radiation [2], [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[1], [2]) as well as in a "simple" (i.e. non-periodic) bent channel [3] are known, although in the latter case the theoretical and experimental data are much less extensive so far.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To estimate the line radiation transport, the algorithm for plane geometry scenarios available in FOREV with the opacity database TOPATOM [11] is used, assuming that the wall radiation flux is equal to one from the plasma in front of particular wall fragment with the temperature T and the density n of carbon impurity calculated as described above. For the case with n DT = 3 · 10 19 m À3 , T = 3 keV, s = 0.1 ms and maximum Q = 0.8 MJ/m 2 the radiation flux at the vessel walls is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Plasma Modelling In Iter Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%