2007
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01196-07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaperones Activate Hepadnavirus Reverse Transcriptase by Transiently Exposing a C-Proximal Region in the Terminal Protein Domain That Contributes to ε RNA Binding

Abstract: All hepatitis B viruses replicate by protein-primed reverse transcription, employing a specialized reverse transcriptase, P protein, that carries a unique terminal protein (TP) domain. To initiate reverse transcription, P protein must bind to a stem-loop, , on the pregenomic RNA template. TP then provides a Y residue for covalent attachment of the first nucleotide of an -templated DNA oligonucleotide (priming reaction) that serves to initiate full-length minus-strand DNA synthesis. binding requires the chapero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
83
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
9
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) This finding supports that the hypothesis that the pol-core interaction requires e binding by pol, and is in agreement with a pol-dependent cytoplasmic core retention. It further suggests that e binding changes the structure of pol aside from the already documented changes caused by pol-hsp70 and 90 interaction (Stahl et al, 2007). (3) The observation that pol becomes activated by binding to its RNA (Tavis & Ganem, 1996) supports the hypothesis that the supposed structural change of pol is essential for the viral life cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) This finding supports that the hypothesis that the pol-core interaction requires e binding by pol, and is in agreement with a pol-dependent cytoplasmic core retention. It further suggests that e binding changes the structure of pol aside from the already documented changes caused by pol-hsp70 and 90 interaction (Stahl et al, 2007). (3) The observation that pol becomes activated by binding to its RNA (Tavis & Ganem, 1996) supports the hypothesis that the supposed structural change of pol is essential for the viral life cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Pol requires interactions with different heat-shock proteins (at least hsp40, hsp70 and hsp90; Beck & Nassal, 2003;Hu et al, 2004;Stahl et al, 2007) for binding to e. Subsequently the pol-e complex becomes encapsidated into the assembling capsids but only if core is phosphorylated at Ser 162 (Gazina et al, 2000). Conversion to DNA is facilitated by pol and occurs inside the capsid requiring phosphorylation of core at further sites (Gazina et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fulllength RT requires the assistance of the host cell chaperone proteins in order to establish and maintain a conformation that is competent to recognize the ε RNA and to initiate protein priming (9,10,13,15,17,18,41,42). However, a truncated DHBV RT protein, MiniRT2, with deletion of the entire RNase H domain, the N-terminal third of the TP domain, and most of the spacer, retains ε RNA binding and protein priming activity but no longer requires the host chaperones (55).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a cellular chaperone complex consisting of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and its cofactors (Hsp70, Hsp40, Hop, and p23) has been identified as a critical host factor required for protein priming by helping to establish and maintain an RT conformation competent for ε binding and protein priming (7,20,21,24,26,27,43). Interestingly, by removing the N-terminal third of TP, most of the spacer, part of the RT domain (the putative thumb subdomain), and the entire RNase H domain, we have recently isolated a truncated RT protein from the duck HBV (DHBV), MiniRT2, which no longer strictly depends on the host chaperones for protein priming (55).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, very little is known about the structural details of hepadnavirus RT proteins, due to the lack of any high-resolution structural data. On the other hand, limited proteolysis, which leads to more-frequent cleavages at surface-accessible sites than at less accessible sites, has been used with some success to reveal the RT conformational maturation as induced by cellular chaperones (43) and ε binding (47,48). We therefore decided to adopt this approach in an attempt to directly demonstrate any RT structural differences induced by Mn 2ϩ versus Mg 2ϩ as well as the presumed RT structural transition from initiation to polymerization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%