2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/abd445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of a multi-view fringe projection system based on the stereo matching of rectified phase maps

Abstract: Multi-view fringe projection systems can be effective solutions to address the limitations imposed by the limited field of view, line-of-sight issues and occlusions when measuring the geometry of complex objects, associated with single camera–projector systems. However, characterisation of a multi-view system is challenging since it requires the cameras and projectors to be in a common global coordinate system. We present a method for characterising a multi-view fringe projection system which does not require … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A traditional point cloud comparison method is cloud-tocloud (C2C), which does not require meshing data or calculation of normal vectors. The distances are determined between a point cloud regarded as a reference and a target point cloud [45,46]. However, the distance measured using this method is sensitive to the roughness, outliers and point spacing distribution of point clouds.…”
Section: Related Methods For Processing Point Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A traditional point cloud comparison method is cloud-tocloud (C2C), which does not require meshing data or calculation of normal vectors. The distances are determined between a point cloud regarded as a reference and a target point cloud [45,46]. However, the distance measured using this method is sensitive to the roughness, outliers and point spacing distribution of point clouds.…”
Section: Related Methods For Processing Point Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, a frequent issue is represented by the inherent limitation requiring optical solutions to operate successfully within the line-of-sight, making the acquisition of large and/or complex structures from a single measurement position impossible [88,104] (see Fig. 7).…”
Section: Geometric Complexity Part Size and Surface Texture Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most significant complexity of multi-view instruments is the structural relationship between the components (multi-camera, multi-cameraprojector, etc) and their individual characterisation [115]. In the last decade, several authors have proposed methods to solve the issues surrounding multi-view characterisation.…”
Section: Characterisation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gai et al [123] proposed a user-friendly characterisation method for multi-view fringe projection, where digital fringe projection and phase maps are used to acquire global characterisation information. Similarly, Shaheen et al [115] proposed a characterisation approach for a multi-view fringe projection system based on correspondences between rectified unwrapped stereo phase maps, where the matched phase values between the stereo phase images are triangulated to acquire 3D point clouds. The developed setup comprised of two stereo pairs (four DSLR cameras and two projectors) is shown in figure 3.…”
Section: Characterisation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%