1994
DOI: 10.1002/maco.19940451205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of reaction layers on copper surfaces formed in aqueous chloride and sulphate ion containing electrolytes

Abstract: Copper is in a passive state in a potential range of 50 mVH to about 300 mVH in contact with an aqueous electrolyte at neutral pH caused by the formation of a thin tarnishing layer consisting of copper(I)‐corrosion products. This layer inhibits more the anodic than the cathodic partial reaction of the corrosion process. The steep threshold in the transpassive range leads to the oxidation of copper and the formation of secondarily formed reaction layers. In sulphate containing electrolytes voluminous reaction l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6 The reduction of Cu 2 O at −0.9 V SCE was observed only for pH 5 and 6 ESDW solutions, not at pH 7 and higher, which indicates that Cu 2 O is converted either from precipitation reactions of Cu 2+ ͑two steps via Reactions 16 and 17 in Table V͒ 32 or CuCl 2 − ͑Reaction 18 in Table V͒ 4 or the hydrolysis reaction of CuCl ͑Reaction 19 in Table V͒. 33,34 By comparison, the spontaneous passivity formed by the reaction 2Cu + H 2 O ↔ Cu 2 O + 2H + + 2e − at higher pH ͑Ն7͒ is too thin to be observed. The Cu 2 O film formed by precipitation in solutions containing Cu 2+ is much thicker than the Cu 2 O film that is obtained by direct anodic oxidation.…”
Section: Journal Of the Electrochemical Society 157 ͑5͒ C200-c211 ͑20...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…5,6 The reduction of Cu 2 O at −0.9 V SCE was observed only for pH 5 and 6 ESDW solutions, not at pH 7 and higher, which indicates that Cu 2 O is converted either from precipitation reactions of Cu 2+ ͑two steps via Reactions 16 and 17 in Table V͒ 32 or CuCl 2 − ͑Reaction 18 in Table V͒ 4 or the hydrolysis reaction of CuCl ͑Reaction 19 in Table V͒. 33,34 By comparison, the spontaneous passivity formed by the reaction 2Cu + H 2 O ↔ Cu 2 O + 2H + + 2e − at higher pH ͑Ն7͒ is too thin to be observed. The Cu 2 O film formed by precipitation in solutions containing Cu 2+ is much thicker than the Cu 2 O film that is obtained by direct anodic oxidation.…”
Section: Journal Of the Electrochemical Society 157 ͑5͒ C200-c211 ͑20...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…50,51,69 This hypothesis is supported by experimental findings. 70 When the solid/liquid interface is completely covered with tenorite, the oxidation of copper stops owing to the lack of electrical conductivity of the film. 68 Although these findings support the earlier considerations of Ives and Rawson, their electrochemical model cannot explain the strong effect of carbon dioxide on the corrosion process.…”
Section: Copper Oxidation and Oxygen Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incipient pits were only observed on passivated copper in pH 8 and 9 synthetic drinking water but not at pH 6.5 and 7, where copper did not exhibit thin-film passivity formed by direct oxidation but instead formed reprecipitated films. 39,[46][47][48][49] However, it has been shown that although Cl − initiates pitting on copper, [50][51][52][53][54] it has a passivating effect after pit initiation, possibly due to the precipitation of CuCl in pits. The effect of each anion on the stability of the passive film on copper has been widely studied in different environments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 Cl − and SO 4 2− are two important anions which are believed to cause copper-pipe pitting problems in potable water systems. 39,[46][47][48][49] However, it has been shown that although Cl − initiates pitting on copper, [50][51][52][53][54] it has a passivating effect after pit initiation, possibly due to the precipitation of CuCl in pits. 38,41,46 In contrast, SO 4 2− only causes active pitting and may be a more potent anion than Cl − .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%