2000
DOI: 10.4102/jsava.v71i3.706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and performance of village animal health workers and veterinary assistants in northern Malawi

Abstract: Fourty-two village animal health workers called keymen (KM) and 84 veterinary assistants (VA) involved in a Basic Animal Health Service (BAHS) Programme in northern Malawi were interviewed during 1998. The general characteristics and perceptions of both groups were analysed using uni- and multivariate techniques. Detailed sales and treatment patterns of six KMand 12 VAwere evaluated for the period September 1996 to August 1997. Results indicated an overall job-satisfaction for 82 % of KM and 83 % of VA. Estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of VAHWs provided their animal health services to large ruminants rather than pigs or poultry, and these findings were similar to the previous reports from Cambodia (Bhandari et al., 2011; MacPhillamy et al., 2019; Stratton et al., 2015) and northern Malawi (Huttner et al., 2000). It should be noted that although VAHWs may wish to provide animal health services to poultry, farmers generally do not think it worthwhile spending money for low‐value village poultry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The majority of VAHWs provided their animal health services to large ruminants rather than pigs or poultry, and these findings were similar to the previous reports from Cambodia (Bhandari et al., 2011; MacPhillamy et al., 2019; Stratton et al., 2015) and northern Malawi (Huttner et al., 2000). It should be noted that although VAHWs may wish to provide animal health services to poultry, farmers generally do not think it worthwhile spending money for low‐value village poultry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%