Characteristics of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and strain elastography of locally advanced breast cancer

Abstract

Background: Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is one of the subgroups of invasive breast cancer.The treatment of LABC is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before surgery, which is different from the others. The study aimed to analyze and compare the characteristics of conventional ultrasound, contrastenhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and strain elastography (SE) in LABC patients who have different treatment outcomes, and to provide help for LABC in the imaging diagnosis and clinic treatment. Methods:From May 2018 to April 2019, 36 patients (40 lesions) of LABC were enrolled, which diagnosed by puncture biopsy. According to the clinical evaluation, these patients were recommended to undergo preoperative NAC followed by surgery. All patients underwent conventional ultrasound, CEUS and SE before puncture. According to postoperative pathological grading and follow-up, the patients were divided into effective and ineffective groups. We summarized and compared the features of conventional ultrasound, CEUS and SE of patients in two groups. The correlation between the imaging characteristics and the postoperative pathological grading was also analyzed. Results:Conventional ultrasonic features of LABC: the most lesions of LABC were mass type (32/40, 80.0%), and all lesions were irregular. Most of lesions showed unclear boundaries (39/40, 97.5%), heterogeneous echoes (38/40, 95.0%), and internal calcifications (24/40, 60.0%). Most of lesions had hyperechoic halos (31/40, 77.5%), aspect ratio less than or equal to 1 (34/40, 85.0%), and blood flow grading was III (36/40, 90.0%). CEUS features of LABC: compared with the surrounding normal tissues, all the lesions (40/40,100.0%) were highly enhanced. Most of lesions (35/40, 87.5%) were uneven enhanced. The main enhancement mode was "fast in and slow out" (39/40, 97.5%). There were totally 25 lesions which had "solar sign" (25/40, 62.5%). SE features of LABC: the average visual elastography score of the lesions was 4.28±0.67, the maximum strain rate (E1) of the lesions averaged 4.88±0.54, and the overall strain rate of the lesion averaged 4.14±0.72. There was no significant difference between effective and ineffective groups in the characteristics of conventional ultrasound, CEUS and SE. There was a correlation between the appearance of "solar sign" in CEUS and postoperative pathological grading, and the contingency coefficient was 0.564 Gu et al. Multimodal ultrasonic imaging of LABC

Multi-parameter ultrasonography-based predictive model for breast cancer diagnosis

“…Our study also showed similar findings related to disordered and disseminated blood flow. Rich blood flow is an indicator of the faster growth and higher metabolism of malignant tumors over benign tumors ( 26 , 27 ). Abnormal lymph nodes on US images, a possible indicator of high tumor aggressiveness, could also help detect breast cancers, as previously reported ( 28 , 29 ).…”

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast tumors: an initial experience

“…Arteriovenous shunting explains fast wash out of contrast. 9 Fibrotic tissue and degeneration can be seen as areas of tumor without enhancement ( Figure 2 ). Some of the cases demonstrated peritumoral hyperenhancement ( Figure 3 ).…”

A Narrative Review of Ultrasound Technologies for the Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer

“… 62 , 63 Stiffer masses are more likely to represent malignancies. 64 Hayashi et al first reported tumor stiffness assessed using SE. 65 They examined the correlation between elasticity scores and treatment responses.…”

“…However, other research demonstrated that SE imaging before NAC had no relationship with pathological complete response. 64 The change in score and SR of elastography after NAC can be acquired by evaluating the score and SR of elastography before and after NAC. The score and SR of elastography of the tumors obtaining pCR were found to be decreased, and the degree of reduction was higher than those without pCR.…”

“… 42 They indicated that CEUS and SE had equal advantages in predicting the response to NAC, which was the same conclusion as that of the Gu et al study. 64 However, SE also has certain limitations. First, SE is highly dependent on the operators due to manual pressurization.…”