2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.09.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and optimization of a plasma doping process using a pulsed RF-excited B2H6 plasma system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process conditions of the conventional B beam-line ion implantation are as follows: ion species is B + ; energy is 2keV; dose is 5×10 15 /cm 2 ; implant angle is 0°. The PLAD system is a pulsed, RF-excited continuous plasma-doping system, described in detail elsewhere [11]. The PLAD process conditions are as follows: the doping gas is B 2 H 6 , the nominal implant voltage and dose are -6kV and 2×10 16 /cm 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Experiments Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process conditions of the conventional B beam-line ion implantation are as follows: ion species is B + ; energy is 2keV; dose is 5×10 15 /cm 2 ; implant angle is 0°. The PLAD system is a pulsed, RF-excited continuous plasma-doping system, described in detail elsewhere [11]. The PLAD process conditions are as follows: the doping gas is B 2 H 6 , the nominal implant voltage and dose are -6kV and 2×10 16 /cm 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Experiments Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PLAD system is a pulsed, RF-excited continuous plasma-doping system, described in detail elsewhere [9]. Poly gate is 70nm in-situ P-doped poly-Si film.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process conditions of the conventional beam-line ion implantation were as follows: Ion species was 11 B + , energy was 2 keV, dose was 5 × 10 15 /cm 2 , and implant angle was 0 • . The PLAD system was a continuous RF-excited pulsed PLAD system described in detail elsewhere [12]. The PLAD process conditions were as follows: The doping gas was B 2 H 6 (Diborane), and the nominal implant voltage and dose were −6 kV and 2 × 10 16 /cm 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PLAD shows a slightly higher (∼2%) average mobility because PLAD has less damage than that of beamline implant, although this slight difference is within the measurement error of the CAOT/DHE technique. It was attributed to the fact that PLAD has no direct ion bombardments on the Si substrate because B 2 H 6 PLAD has B deposition during implant [12]. These higher B and hole concentrations near the Si surface with higher carrier dose and slightly higher average mobility of the PLAD process are attributed to an improved device performance than those processed by beam-line implant, including much lower SD contact resistance, lower SD sheet resistance, and higher drive current and transconductance [15].…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%