2014
DOI: 10.1118/1.4900820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of energy response for photon‐counting detectors using x‐ray fluorescence

Abstract: The performance of a spectral imaging system using energy-resolved photon-counting detectors is very dependent on the energy calibration of the detector. The proposed x-ray fluorescence technique offers an accurate and efficient way to calibrate the energy response of a photon-counting detector.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tabulated or computer-generated x-ray spectra are useful for computer simulations pertaining to modeling of beam shaping filter performance, 1,2 imaging performance modeling, [3][4][5][6] validation of x-ray spectral measurements, 7-9 radiation dose, 10,11 modeling of photon counting spectral/dual-energy imaging systems, 8,[12][13][14] and many other applications. Recently, a tungsten anode spectral model using interpolating cubic splines (TASMICS 15 ) was proposed to update the previous tungsten anode spectral model using interpolating polynomials (TASMIP 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tabulated or computer-generated x-ray spectra are useful for computer simulations pertaining to modeling of beam shaping filter performance, 1,2 imaging performance modeling, [3][4][5][6] validation of x-ray spectral measurements, 7-9 radiation dose, 10,11 modeling of photon counting spectral/dual-energy imaging systems, 8,[12][13][14] and many other applications. Recently, a tungsten anode spectral model using interpolating cubic splines (TASMICS 15 ) was proposed to update the previous tungsten anode spectral model using interpolating polynomials (TASMIP 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the analytic detector response function [27] was utilized to simulate the non-ideal detector response. With properly selected energy intervals, the raw spectral data with non-ideal detector response were corrected to the spectral data for ideal detector response so that the proposed TICMR method can be applied directly based on the model (4) with ideal detector response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the R matrix is defined as Rnl=normalΔEldEnormalΔEnDfalse(E,Efalse)Sfalse(Efalse)dE. where the detector response function D ( E ′, E ) is calibrated using X-ray fluorescence [27], and then the Poisson noise was added to the measurements pointwisely, i.e., Yl=Poissonfalse(Yl*false),for  l=10,,65. Finally, with a proper choice of energy intervals, the interval 10 ≤ Ẽ ≤ 65 was divided into five energy groups 10 ≤ E 1 ≤ 32, 33 ≤ E 2 ≤ 39, 40 ≤ E 3 ≤ 47, 48 ≤ E 4 ≤ 57, 58 ≤ E 5 ≤ 65, and then corrected projection data and total projection data were as follows, P¯=logl=165Yll=165n=165Rnl; and P˜=logfalse(R˜1false). where m=lEmYl, for 1 ≤ m ≤ 5, R˜mk=lEmnEkRnl, for 1 ≤ m, k ≤ 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A method for establishing the energy response function of Si-strip photon counting detectors used for XRF-CT was reported by Ding et al 94 who used a tungsten target X-ray tube operated at 80 kV, various beam lters and samples containing Ag, Ba, Gd or I. A mathematical model for the response function of a Si(PIN) detector was proposed 92 in which there were four components: a Gaussian peak; a truncated shelf; an exponential tail and a Gaussian silicon escape peak.…”
Section: X-ray Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%