2012
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02024-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Recovered from a Phase IV Clinical Trial for Linezolid versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia

Abstract: A total of 434 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) baseline isolates were collected from subjects enrolled in a prospective, double-blind randomized trial comparing linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. Isolates were susceptibility tested by broth microdilution, examined for inducible clindamycin resistance by D-test, and screened for heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin (hVISA) by the Etest macromethod. All strains were subjected to PantonValentine leukocidin … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
26
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our goal was to determine bacterial and epithelial responses that follow early interactions between the alveolar wall and USA300, with an eye to understanding the time course of bacterial stabilization and subsequent epithelial injury. We also addressed the puzzling feature of this pathology that although USA300 might be antibiotic sensitive in vitro (22,23), antibiotics tend to be ineffective in containing lung injury (23)(24)(25), possibly because of host factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal was to determine bacterial and epithelial responses that follow early interactions between the alveolar wall and USA300, with an eye to understanding the time course of bacterial stabilization and subsequent epithelial injury. We also addressed the puzzling feature of this pathology that although USA300 might be antibiotic sensitive in vitro (22,23), antibiotics tend to be ineffective in containing lung injury (23)(24)(25), possibly because of host factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These broad selection criteria were intentionally applied to provide maximum strain variability, and the results indicate the ability of the system to correctly identify S. aureus and MRSA among diverse collections of organisms. However, several studies have documented the overwhelming presence of USA300 (CC8) and USA100 (CC5) carrying SCCmec types IV and II, respectively, in the United States (22,(25)(26)(27), while the MRSA population in Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific countries seem to be more heterogeneous (22,25,28). Therefore, validation prior to clinical use in regions other than the United States seems prudent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolates showing discrepant results regarding bacterial identification or the methicillin (oxacillin) status between the BD Max StaphSR and phenotypic assays were repeated. Remaining discrepant results on repeat testing were evaluated further by using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) and in-house PCR assays for detection of nuc and/or mecA/C (21) and epidemiology typing (i.e., multilocus sequence typing [MLST], spa and SCCmec typing) (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five isolates each were typed as clonal complex 5 (CC5) or CC45. We focused on these CCs because CC5 is a leading cause of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) associated with complicated infections (15)(16)(17), whereas CC45 is a predominant colonizer of healthy individuals, and is also found in bloodstream infections associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes in Europe (Berlin-IV) and the United States (USA600) (18,19). By strategically selecting samples from opposite ends of a continuum of clinical readouts and clonotypes (PB/RB and CC5/45, respectively), we postulated that this would provide the best opportunity to test linkage between FnBPs and differential therapeutic outcomes in non-CDI S. aureus bacteremia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%